Semantic memory is an amodal, dynamic system: Evidence from the interaction of naming and object use in semantic dementia

被引:96
作者
Coccia, M
Bartolini, M
Luzzi, S
Provinciali, L
Ralph, MAL
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Psychol, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Osped Umberto 1, Dipartimento Sci Neurol, IT-60020 Ancona, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02643290342000113
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Classic neurological accounts and some contemporary theories of semantic memory assume that concepts are acquired through a learning process that draws together information experienced in each of our verbal and nonverbal modalities. These accounts embody three critical assumptions: semantic representations are amodal; the mapping between surface form and meaning varies for different modalities; and the representations are dynamic. The influence of these three factors was revealed in data collected over a 4-year longitudinal period in two patients with semantic dementia. Semantic assessment revealed a parallel decline in verbal and nonverbal aspects of conceptual knowledge, reflecting a gradual degradation of a single amodal semantic system. As expected, when the patients' semantic impairment was mild, they presented with profound anomia but relatively preserved object use. Over time, performance on all semantic tasks including object use declined. High item-by-item consistency across these tasks was observed in all testing sessions. The impact of dynamic semantic representations was revealed by a striking clinical finding. Although unable to name many of the objects in isolation, their performance was significantly facilitated if they were asked to name while they demonstrated the use of each object. These results are discussed in the context of contemporary models of semantic memory.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 527
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Allport D.A., 1985, CURRENT PERSPECTIVES
[2]   Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia [J].
Bozeat, S ;
Ralph, MAL ;
Patterson, K ;
Garrard, P ;
Hodges, JR .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2000, 38 (09) :1207-1215
[3]   The influence of personal familiarity and context on object use in semantic dementia [J].
Bozeat, S ;
Ralph, MAL ;
Patterson, K ;
Hodges, JR .
NEUROCASE, 2002, 8 (1-2) :127-134
[4]   When objects lose their meaning: What happens to their use? [J].
Bozeat, Sasha ;
Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon ;
Patterson, Karalyn ;
Hodges, John R. .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 2 (03) :236-251
[5]   The role of semantic memory in object use [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Schwartz, MF ;
Carew, TG .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 14 (02) :219-254
[6]   Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Saffran, EM .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 82 (02) :179-199
[7]   VALIDITY OF SOME NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF MENTAL DETERIORATION [J].
CALTAGIRONE, C ;
GAINOTTI, G ;
MASULLO, C ;
MICELI, G .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1979, 60 (01) :50-56
[8]   Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction [J].
Caramazza, A ;
Shelton, JR .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (01) :1-34
[9]   THE MULTIPLE SEMANTICS HYPOTHESIS - MULTIPLE CONFUSIONS [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
HILLIS, AE ;
RAPP, BC ;
ROMANI, C .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 7 (03) :161-189
[10]   On the status of object concepts in aphasia [J].
Chertkow, H ;
Bub, D ;
Deaudon, C ;
Whitehead, V .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 58 (02) :203-232