Time, place, and consciousness: Three dimensions of meaning for US institutional review boards

被引:7
作者
Putney, SB
Gruskin, S
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Human Subjects Comm, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Program Int Hlth & Human Rights, Francis Xavier Bagnoud Ctr Hlth & Human Rights, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.92.7.1067
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In the past few years, US federal agencies governing research with human subjects and institutional review boards have taken a higher-profile path than ever before, both at home and internationally. This trend carries profound significance for US-based institutions and has implications also for the rest of the world. What does this critical moment of heightened federal scrutiny mean for the workings of US institutional review boards? We examined board activity across 3 dimensions: time, place, and consciousness. We conclude that although institutions in all areas of biomedical and social science research are adapting their practices, the field of public health is especially well positioned to adapt to, and succeed in, new efforts to ensure protection of human research subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1070
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, BAD BLOOD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, BELM REP ETH PRINC G
[3]   RACISM AND RESEARCH - CASE OF TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS STUDY [J].
BRANDT, AM .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1978, 8 (06) :21-29
[4]  
HITTS PJ, 2000, NY TIMES 2909, pA14
[5]  
*I REV BOARDS, 2002, FED REGISTER, V67, P1015
[6]  
LEVINE RJ, 1986, ETHICS REGULATION CL, P70
[7]  
*NAT HUM RES PROT, 2002, DRAFT INT GUID FIN R, V3, P1
[8]  
Reverby Susan., 2000, Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
[9]  
Stolberg S G, 2000, N Y Times Web, pA15
[10]  
2002, FED REG, V67, P14775