Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints

被引:203
作者
Dohn, Uffe Moller [1 ]
Ejbjerg, Bo J.
Court-Payen, Michel
Hasselquist, Maria
Narvestad, Eva
Szkudlarek, Marcin
Moller, Jakob M.
Thomsen, Henrik S.
Ostergaard, Mikkel
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1186/ar1995
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
The objective of the study was, with multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method, to determine whether bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US), but not with radiography, represent true erosive changes. We included 17 RA patients with at least one, previously detected, radiographically invisible MCP joint MRI erosion, and four healthy control individuals. They all underwent CT, MRI, US and radiography of the 2nd to 5th MCP joints of one hand on the same day. Each imaging modality was evaluated for the presence of bone erosions in each MCP joint quadrant. In total, 336 quadrants were examined. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, respectively, for detecting bone erosions (with CT as the reference method) were 19%, 100% and 81% for radiography; 68%, 96% and 89% for MRI; and 42%, 91% and 80% for US. When the 16 quadrants with radiographic erosions were excluded from the analysis, similar values for MRI (65%, 96% and 90%) and US (30%, 92% and 80%) were obtained. CT and MRI detected at least one erosion in all patients but none in control individuals. US detected at least one erosion in 15 patients, however, erosion-like changes were seen on US in all control individuals. Nine patients had no erosions on radiography. In conclusion, with CT as the reference method, MRI and US exhibited high specificities (96% and 91%, respectively) in detecting bone erosions in RA MCP joints, even in the radiographically non-erosive joints (96% and 92%). The moderate sensitivities indicate that even more erosions than are seen on MRI and, particularly, US are present. Radiography exhibited high specificity (100%) but low sensitivity (19%). The present study strongly indicates that bone erosions, detected with MRI and US in RA patients, represent a loss of calcified tissue with cortical destruction, and therefore can be considered true bone erosions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
Alasaarela E, 1998, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V37, P1152
[2]
THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
ARNETT, FC ;
EDWORTHY, SM ;
BLOCH, DA ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
FRIES, JF ;
COOPER, NS ;
HEALEY, LA ;
KAPLAN, SR ;
LIANG, MH ;
LUTHRA, HS ;
MEDSGER, TA ;
MITCHELL, DM ;
NEUSTADT, DH ;
PINALS, RS ;
SCHALLER, JG ;
SHARP, JT ;
WILDER, RL ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03) :315-324
[3]
Backhaus M, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V42, P1232, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1232::AID-ANR21>3.0.CO
[4]
2-3
[5]
BOERS M, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P1773
[6]
Metacarpophalangeal joints at US in asymptomatic volunteers and cadaveric specimens [J].
Boutry, N ;
Lardé, A ;
Demondion, X ;
Cortet, B ;
Cotten, H ;
Cotten, A .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :716-724
[7]
Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage - A randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Conaghan, PG ;
O'Connor, P ;
McGonagle, D ;
Astin, P ;
Wakefield, RJ ;
Gibbon, WW ;
Quinn, M ;
Karim, Z ;
Green, MJ ;
Proudman, S ;
Isaacs, J ;
Emery, P .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (01) :64-71
[8]
Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis: A more precise image or just a more expensive one? [J].
Goldbach-Mansky, R ;
Woodburn, J ;
Yao, L ;
Lipsky, PE .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (03) :585-589
[9]
Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting [J].
Haavardsholm, EA ;
Ostergaard, M ;
Ejbjerg, BJ ;
Kvan, NP ;
Uhlig, TA ;
Lilleås, FG ;
Kvien, TK .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2005, 52 (12) :3860-3867
[10]
Kaarela K, 1985, Scand J Rheumatol Suppl, V57, P1