An Analysis of the Association of Society of Chest Pain Centers Accreditation to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Guideline Adherence

被引:21
作者
Chandra, Abhinav [1 ]
Glickman, Seth W. [1 ]
Ou, Fang-Shu [2 ]
Peacock, W. Frank [3 ]
McCord, James K. [4 ]
Cairns, Charles B. [5 ]
Peterson, Eric D. [2 ]
Ohman, E. Magnus [2 ]
Gibler, W. Brian [6 ]
Roe, Matthew T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Henry Ford Hosp, Henry Ford Heart & Vasc Inst, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; CARE; INSIGHTS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Since 2003, the Society of Chest Pain Centers (SCPC) has provided hospital accreditation for acute coronary syndrome care processes. Our objective is to evaluate the association between SCPC accreditation and adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) evidence-based guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The secondary objective is to describe the clinical outcomes and the association with accreditation. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from patients with NSTEMI enrolled in the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative in 2005. The analysis explored differences between SCPC-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in evidence-based therapy given within the first 24 hours (including aspirin, beta-blocker, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, heparin, and ECG within 10 minutes). Results: Of 33,238 patients treated at 21 accredited hospitals and 323 nonaccredited hospitals, those at SCPC-accredited centers (n=3,059) were more likely to receive aspirin (98.1% versus 95.8%; odds ratio [OR] 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 2.83) and beta-blockers (93.4% versus 90.6%; OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.70) within 24 hours than patients at non-SCPC-accredited centers (n=30,179). No difference was observed in obtaining a timely ECG (40.4% versus 35.2%; OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.67), administering a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.80), or administering heparin (OR 1.12; 95% Cl 0.74 to 1.70). Also, there was no significant difference in risk-adjusted mortality for patients treated at SCPC hospitals versus nonaccredited hospitals (3.4% versus 3.5%; adjusted OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.55). Conclusion: SCPC-accredited hospitals had higher NSTEMI ACC/AHA evidence-based guideline adherence in the first 24 hours of care on 2 of the 5 measures. No difference in outcomes was observed. Further studies are needed to better understand the association between SCPC accreditation and improved care for patients with acute coronary syndrome. [Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:17-25.]
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], The accreditation process: mammography (Revised 11-16-2022)
[2]   Acute coronary syndromes in the GUSTO-IIb trial - Prognostic insights and impact of recurrent ischemia [J].
Armstrong, PW ;
Fu, YL ;
Chang, WC ;
Topol, EJ ;
Granger, CB ;
Betriu, A ;
Van de Werf, F ;
Lee, KL ;
Califf, RM .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (18) :1860-1868
[3]   Chest pain unit concept: Rationale and diagnostic strategies [J].
Blomkalns, AL ;
Gibler, WB .
CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2005, 23 (04) :411-+
[4]   ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction - Summary article - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina) [J].
Braunwald, E ;
Antman, EM ;
Beasley, JW ;
Califf, RM ;
Cheitlin, MD ;
Hochman, JS ;
Jones, RH ;
Kereiakes, D ;
Kupersmith, J ;
Levin, TN ;
Pepine, CJ ;
Schaeffer, JW ;
Smith, EE ;
Steward, DE ;
Theroux, P ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Alpert, JS ;
Faxon, DP ;
Fuster, V ;
Gregoratos, G ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Smith, SC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (07) :1366-1374
[5]  
Chen ZM, 2005, LANCET, V366, P1622
[6]   The Erlanger Chest Pain Evaluation Protocol: A one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes [J].
Fesmire, FM ;
Hughes, AD ;
Fody, EP ;
Jackson, AP ;
Fesmire, CE ;
Gilbert, MA ;
Stout, PK ;
Wojcik, JF ;
Wharton, DR ;
Creel, JH .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (06) :584-594
[7]  
Gibler W Brian, 2003, Rev Cardiovasc Med, V4 Suppl 4, pS47
[8]   Improving the care of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: The CRUSADE initiative [J].
Hoekstra, JW ;
Pollack, CV ;
Roe, MT ;
Peterson, ED ;
Brindis, R ;
Harrington, RA ;
Christenson, RH ;
Smith, SC ;
Ohman, M ;
Gibler, WB .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 9 (11) :1146-1155
[9]   Does concordance with guideline triage recommendations affect clinical care of patients with possible acute coronary syndrome? [J].
Katz, David A. ;
Dawson, Jeffrey ;
Beshansky, Joni R. ;
Rahko, Peter S. ;
Aufderheide, Tom P. ;
Bogner, Mark ;
Tighouart, Hocine ;
Selker, Harry P. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (04) :423-437
[10]   Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Kwong, RY ;
Schussheim, AE ;
Rekhraj, S ;
Aletras, AH ;
Geller, N ;
Davis, J ;
Christian, TF ;
Balaban, RS ;
Arai, AE .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (04) :531-537