Comparative review of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

被引:110
作者
Hesketh, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Div Hematol Oncol, Boston, MA 02135 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3109/07357900009038248
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Since their introduction, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have become the agents of choice in the prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitting and are generally superior to high-dose metoclopramide regimens. The availability of four different agents (ondansetron, granisetron, dolasetron, and tropisetron) within this class has prompted investigations into potential differences between the drugs, which appear to be few. More importantly, the results of recently conducted randomized comparative trials in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy have demonstrated similar efficacy. Although study designs and patient populations differed, seven large comparative trials in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy reported no significant differences in complete or complete plus major response rates among the agents. Similar results were generally reported in trials evaluating patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The safety and tolerability of these agents also appear to be similar. The most common adverse events include headache, gastrointestinal effects, lightheadedness, and sedation. All agents are available in both intravenous and oral dosage forms and may be administered as a single dose.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   THE INCIDENCE OF ANTICIPATORY NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER REPEAT CYCLE CHEMOTHERAPY - THE EFFECT OF GRANISETRON [J].
AAPRO, MS ;
KIRCHNER, V ;
TERREY, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 69 (05) :957-960
[2]   5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS - AN OVERVIEW OF THEIR PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE POTENTIAL IN CANCER THERAPY-INDUCED EMESIS [J].
AAPRO, MS .
DRUGS, 1991, 42 (04) :551-568
[3]   TROPISETRON ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH DEXAMETHASONE FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF EMESIS INDUCED BY NON-CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
ADAMS, M ;
SOUKOP, M ;
BARLEY, V ;
YOSEF, H ;
ANDERSON, N ;
BOESEN, E ;
TRASK, CW ;
RUFENACHT, E ;
DEBRUIJN, KM .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 1995, 6 (04) :514-521
[4]  
ALLEN A, 1995, EUR J CLIN PHARMACOL, V48, P519
[5]  
ANDREWS PL, 1992, EJC SUPPL, V28, P2
[6]   NEUROPHARMACOLOGY OF EMESIS INDUCED BY ANTI-CANCER THERAPY [J].
ANDREWS, PLR ;
RAPEPORT, WG ;
SANGER, GJ .
TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1988, 9 (09) :334-341
[7]  
Audhuy B, 1996, EUR J CANCER, V32A, P807
[8]  
Basurto C, 1995, ANN ONCOL, V6, P805
[9]   EFFICACY OF ORAL ONDANSETRON IN THE PREVENTION OF EMESIS IN OUTPATIENTS RECEIVING CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BECK, TM ;
CIOCIOLA, AA ;
JONES, SE ;
HARVEY, WH ;
TCHEKMEDYIAN, NS ;
CHANG, A ;
GALVIN, D ;
HART, NE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (06) :407-413
[10]   Single-blind study of the effects of intravenous dolasetron mesylate versus ondansetron on electrocardiographic parameters in normal volunteers [J].
Benedict, CR ;
Arbogast, R ;
Martin, L ;
Patton, L ;
Morrill, B ;
Hahne, W .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 28 (01) :53-59