Laparoscopic temporary bilateral uterine artery occlusion with silicone tubing to prevent hemorrhage during vacuum aspiration of cesarean scar pregnancies

被引:23
作者
Wang, Lingling [1 ]
Sun, Lingbin [1 ]
Wang, Lijun [1 ]
Chen, Huifang [1 ]
Ouyang, Xue [1 ]
Qiu, Huiling [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Chenggong Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Xiamen 361003, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
blood loss; cesarean scar pregnancy; laparoscopic temporary uterine artery occlusion; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; EMBOLIZATION; MANAGEMENT; METHOTREXATE; MYOMECTOMY; DIAGNOSIS; CURETTAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/jog.12784
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
AimThe aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and effects of temporary bilateral uterine artery occlusion with silicone tubing on blood loss during vacuum aspiration of cesarean scar pregnancies (CSP). Material and MethodsSix patients with CSP underwent removal of gestational masses via vacuum aspiration. At the beginning of the procedure, all patients underwent laparoscopic temporary bilateral uterine artery occlusion with tubing. The main measurements were the operating time, operative blood loss, Doppler examination of the uterine arteries, and complications of procedure. ResultsThe median operation time was 99 min, the median time needed to put the tubing in place (the time from the opening of the retroperitoneum to positioning of the tubing) was 45.5 min and the median time of bilateral uterine artery occlusion with tubing was 32.5 min. The median blood loss was 97.5 mL, and none of the patients required blood transfusion. Doppler examination showed no difference in the pre- and postoperative resistance or pulsatility indices of the uterine vessels. There were no conspicuous complications. The serum ss-human chorionic gonadotrophin level decreased to normal within 14-27 days after the operation. ConclusionLaparoscopic temporary bilateral uterine artery occlusion with silicone tubing is an effective, minimally invasive procedure for reducing blood loss during vacuum aspiration in patients with CSP.
引用
收藏
页码:1762 / 1768
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
A comparison of combined laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treatment of symptomatic myoma [J].
Alborzi, Saeed ;
Ghannadan, Elmira ;
Alborzi, Soroosh ;
Alborzi, Mehrnoosh .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (02) :742-747
[2]
Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy [J].
Deans, Rebecca ;
Abbott, Jason .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (06) :1735-1740
[3]
Firouznia K, 2013, IRAN RED CRESCENT ME, V15
[4]
Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Gao, LvFen ;
Huang, Zhongwei ;
Gao, Jie ;
Mai, Haoshan ;
Zhang, Yiting ;
Wang, Xiaoyu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 127 (02) :147-151
[5]
An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar [J].
Godin, PA ;
Bassil, S ;
Donnez, J .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (02) :398-400
[6]
Pregnancy outcomes following treatment for fibroids: uterine fibroid embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Goldberg, Jay ;
Pereira, Leonardo .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 18 (04) :402-406
[7]
Pregnancy outcomes after uterine artery occlusion: prospective multicentric study [J].
Holub, Zdenek ;
Mara, Michal ;
Kuzel, David ;
Jabor, Antonin ;
Maskova, Jana ;
Eim, Josef .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (05) :1886-1891
[8]
Hong SC, 2011, SINGAP MED J, V52, pE115
[9]
Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Huang, Qiang ;
Zhang, Miao ;
Zhai, Ren-You .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (07) :1890-1893
[10]
Outcome, complications and future fertility in women treated with uterine artery embolization and methotrexate for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy [J].
Krissi, Haim ;
Hiersch, Liran ;
Stolovitch, Natan ;
Nitke, Shmuel ;
Wiznitzer, Arnon ;
Peled, Yoav .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 182 :172-176