Treatment outcome of chronic non-malignant pain patients managed in a Danish multidisciplinary pain centre compared to general practice: a randomised controlled trial

被引:135
作者
Becker, N
Sjogren, P
Bech, P
Olsen, AK
Eriksen, J
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Danish Natl Hosp, HS Multidisciplinary Pain Ctr, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
[2] Frederiksborg Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Hillerod, Denmark
关键词
pain center; chronic pain; treatment outcome; outpatient; primary care;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00209-2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This randomised controlled study investigated the effect of outpatient multidisciplinary pain centre treatment (MPT) compared with treatment by a general practitioner after initial supervision by a pain specialist (GP-group) and with a group of patients waiting for 6 months before treatment was initiated (WL-group). One-hundred-and-eighty-nine chronic non-malignant pain patients were studied. At referral, and after 3 and 6 months patients filled in questionnaires evaluating pain intensity, health related quality of life (HRQL) and use of analgesics. HRQL was evaluated using the Medical Outcome Study-Short Form (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) and the Psychological General Well-being Scale (PGWB). After 6 months patients allocated,to MPT (n = 63) reported statistically significant reduction in pain intensity (VAS-score, P < 0.001), improvement in psychological :well-being (PGWB, P < 0.001. quality of sleep (P < 0.05) and physical functioning (SF-36-Phycical Functioning, P < 0.05). No improvements were seen in the GP-group (n = 63). In the WL-group (n = 63) a statistically significant deterioration was observed in PGWB-scores, HAD-scores and in 6 of 8 SF-36-subscores (P less than or equal to 0.05). A reduction in use of opioids administered on demand was obtained in the-group receiving MPT (P < 0.001). In the MPT- and GP-grougs a decrease in the use of short acting opioids was observed (P < 0.01). No change in use of analgesics was seen in the Wt-group. The study showed that (i) in the MPT-,group there was a significant reduction in pain intensity and improvement of HRQL compared to the WL-group and (ii) the mere establishment of a pain diagnosis and a pain management plan by a pain specialist was not sufficient to enable the referring GP to manage severely chronic pain patients. (C) 2000 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 211
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
NAYLOR AS, 1996, EPILEPSY PSYCHIAT DI, P108
[22]   COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL GROUP TREATMENT AND AN ALTERNATIVE NONPSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT FOR CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
NICHOLAS, MK ;
WILSON, PH ;
GOYEN, J .
PAIN, 1992, 48 (03) :339-347
[23]   DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL, COMPARATIVE-STUDY ON QUALITY-OF-LIFE DURING TREATMENT WITH AMLODIPINE OR ENALAPRIL IN MILD OR MODERATE HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
OMVIK, P ;
THAULOW, E ;
HERLAND, OB ;
EIDE, I ;
MIDHA, R ;
TURNER, RR .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1993, 11 (01) :103-113
[24]   ASSESSING BENEFITS OF THE PAIN-CENTER - WHY SOME PATIENTS REGRESS [J].
PAINTER, JR ;
SERES, JL ;
NEWMAN, RI .
PAIN, 1980, 8 (01) :101-113
[25]   FOLLOW-UP RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT PAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS [J].
PETERS, J ;
LARGE, RG ;
ELKIND, G .
PAIN, 1992, 50 (01) :41-50
[26]   A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL EVALUATING INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT PAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS [J].
PETERS, JL ;
LARGE, RG .
PAIN, 1990, 41 (03) :283-293
[27]   COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR MIGRAINE HEADACHES - A MINIMAL-THERAPIST-CONTACT APPROACH VERSUS A CLINIC-BASED APPROACH [J].
RICHARDSON, GM ;
MCGRATH, PJ .
HEADACHE, 1989, 29 (06) :352-357
[28]   THE BEHAVIORAL-MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP WITH COMPARISON GROUPS [J].
ROBERTS, AH ;
REINHARDT, L .
PAIN, 1980, 8 (02) :151-162
[30]   THE MOS SHORT-FORM GENERAL HEALTH SURVEY - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY IN A PATIENT POPULATION [J].
STEWART, AL ;
HAYS, RD ;
WARE, JE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1988, 26 (07) :724-732