Are preferences for equity over efficiency in health care allocation "all or nothing"?

被引:37
作者
Ubel, PA
Baron, J
Nash, B
Asch, DA
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Div Gen Internal Med, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Physicians Online, Tarrytown, NY USA
关键词
ethics; allocation; rationing; cost-effectiveness analysis; physician survey; general public survey;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-200004000-00003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. In a previous study we showed that within a budget constraint, most people would rather offer a less effective screening test to 100% of a Medicaid population, thereby saving 1,000 lives, than a more effective test to 50% of the population, thereby saving 1,100 lives. We present here a study exploring whether this preference for equity over efficiency persists when neither test can be offered to the entire population. METHODS. Members of Physicians' Online and prospective jurors at the Philadelphia County Courthouse randomly received I of 3 questionnaires (41, 42, or 43) describing a limited budget to screen Medicaid enrollees for colon cancer, In all questionnaires, test I was said to save 1,000 lives, and test 2, a more effective and more expensive test, was said to save 1;100. In 41,test I was offered to 100% and test:! to 50% of the population In 42, the 2 tests could be offered to 50% and 25%, respectively; in 43,to 90% and 40%, respectively. Respondents indicated which test they recommended and provided justification. RESULTS. The majority of physicians (59%) and the general public (56%) receiving Q1 favored the less effective screening test However, of those receiving Q2,only 26% of physicians and 27% of the general public recommended the less effective screening test And of: those receiving Q3, only 38% of physicians and 28% of the general public recommended the less effective test. Justifications for these recommendations were based largely on concerns for equality of: treatment among those who chose the less effective test and concerns for saving the most lives among those who preferred the more effective test. CONCLUSIONS, Although most: respondents show a preference for equity over efficiency when equity means that 100% of a population can receive a service, many fewer;respondents maintain this preference when equity is no longer absolute. This result suggests that the preference for equity is sometimes "all or none."
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 373
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Baron J, 1998, Judgment misguided: Intuition and error in public decision making
[2]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS, EXTENDED DOMINANCE, AND ETHICS - A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT [J].
CANTOR, SB .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 14 (03) :259-265
[3]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS IN HEALTH-CARE [J].
EMERY, DD ;
SCHNEIDERMAN, LJ .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1989, 19 (04) :8-13
[4]   SETTING HEALTH-CARE PRIORITIES IN OREGON - COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEETS THE RULE OF RESCUE [J].
HADORN, DC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (17) :2218-2225
[5]  
Kamlet MS., 1992, The comparative benefits modeling project: a framework for cost-utility analysis of government health care programs
[6]   EVALUATING DECISION STRATEGIES FOR EQUITY OF PUBLIC RISKS [J].
KEENEY, RL ;
WINKLER, RL .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (05) :955-970
[7]   HELP OR HINDRANCE - THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS IN RATIONING HEALTH-CARE [J].
MAYNARD, A ;
BLOOR, K .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 51 (04) :854-868
[8]  
Murray C.J. L., 1996, Burden of Disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020
[9]   WHO CARES ABOUT COST - DOES ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS IMPOSE OR REFLECT SOCIAL VALUES [J].
NORD, E ;
RICHARDSON, J ;
STREET, A ;
KUHSE, H ;
SINGER, P .
HEALTH POLICY, 1995, 34 (02) :79-94
[10]   MAXIMIZING HEALTH BENEFITS VS EGALITARIANISM - AN AUSTRALIAN SURVEY OF HEALTH ISSUES [J].
NORD, E ;
RICHARDSON, J ;
STREET, A ;
KUHSE, H ;
SINGER, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (10) :1429-1437