Multiple discreteness and product differentiation:: Demand for carbonated soft drinks

被引:156
作者
Dubé, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Grad Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
multiple discreteness; structural modeling; customer behavior; brand choice;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1030.0041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
For several of the largest supermarket product categories, such as carbonated soft drinks, canned soups, ready-to-eat cereals, and cookies, consumers regularly purchase assortments of products. Within the category, consumers often purchase multiple products and multiple units of each alternative selected on a given trip. This multiple discreteness violates the single-unit purchase assumption of multinomial logit and probit models. The misspecification of such demand models in categories exhibiting multiple discreteness would produce incorrect measures of consumer response to marketing mix variables. In studying product strategy, these models would lead to misleading managerial conclusions. We use an alternative microeconomic model of demand for categories that exhibit the multiple discreteness problem. Recognizing the separation between the time of purchase and the time of consumption, we model consumers purchasing bundles of goods in anticipation of a stream of consumption occasions before the next trip. We apply the model to a panel of household purchases for carbonated soft drinks.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 81
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ALLENBY GM, 2001, MARKET SCI, V23, P95
[2]  
ANDERSON E, 2001, STRUCTURAL DEMAND MO
[3]  
[Anonymous], MARKETING SCI
[4]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[5]   ESTIMATING DISCRETE-CHOICE MODELS OF PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
BERRY, ST .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 25 (02) :242-262
[6]   A SIMULTANEOUS APPROACH TO THE WHETHER, WHAT AND HOW MUCH TO BUY QUESTIONS [J].
CHIANG, JW .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1991, 10 (04) :297-315
[7]   Panel data analysis of household brand choices [J].
Chintagunta, P ;
Kyriazidou, E ;
Perktold, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2001, 103 (1-2) :111-153
[8]  
CHINTAGUNTA P, 2002, BALANCING PROFITABIL
[9]   INVESTIGATING PURCHASE INCIDENCE, BRAND CHOICE AND PURCHASE QUANTITY DECISIONS OF HOUSEHOLDS [J].
CHINTAGUNTA, PK .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (02) :184-208
[10]   ESTIMATING A MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL OF BRAND CHOICE USING THE METHOD OF SIMULATED MOMENTS [J].
CHINTAGUNTA, PK .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1992, 11 (04) :386-407