Drape estimation vs. visual assessment for estimating postpartum hemorrhage

被引:198
作者
Patel, A. [1 ]
Goudar, S. S.
Geller, S. E.
Kodkanyb, B. S.
Edlavitch, S. A.
Wagh, K.
Patted, S. S.
Naik, V. A.
Moss, N.
Derman, R. J.
机构
[1] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Chicago, IL USA
[2] JN Med Coll, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Kansas City Sch Med, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[5] NICHHD, Global Network Womens & Childrens Hlth Res, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
postpartum hemorrhage; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality; blood collection;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare (1) visual estimation of postpartum blood loss with estimation using a specifically designed blood collection drape and (2) the drape estimate with a measurement of blood toss by photospectrometry. Methods: A randomized controlled study was performed with 123 women delivered at the District Hospital, Belgaum, India. The women were randomized to visual or drape estimation of blood loss. A subsample of 10 drape estimates was compared with photospectrometry results. Results: The visual estimate of blood toss was 33% less than the drape estimate. The interclass correlation of the drape estimate to photospectrometry measurement was 0.92. Conclusion: Drape estimation of blood loss is more accurate than visual estimation and may have particular utility in the developing world. Prompt detection of postpartum hemorrhage may reduce maternal morbidity and mortality in tow-resource settings. (c) 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Validation of a laboratory method of measuring postpartum blood loss [J].
Chua, S ;
Ho, LM ;
Vanaja, K ;
Nordstrom, L ;
Roy, AC ;
Arulkumaran, S .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1998, 46 (01) :31-33
[2]   DISCREPANCY BETWEEN LABORATORY DETERMINATION AND VISUAL ESTIMATION OF BLOOD-LOSS DURING NORMAL DELIVERY [J].
DUTHIE, SJ ;
VEN, D ;
YUNG, GLK ;
GUANG, DZ ;
CHAN, SYW ;
MA, HK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 38 (02) :119-124
[3]   Conducting international collaborative research in developing nations [J].
Geller, SE ;
Patel, A ;
Niak, VA ;
Goudar, SS ;
Edlavitch, SA ;
Kodkany, BS ;
Derman, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 87 (03) :267-271
[4]  
Haswell J N, 1981, J Indiana State Med Assoc, V74, P34
[5]   BLOOD-LOSS AT VAGINAL DELIVERY [J].
HILL, JA ;
FADEL, HE ;
NELSON, MC ;
NELSON, RM ;
NELSON, GH .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 79 (02) :188-192
[6]  
*INT FED GYN OBST, JOINT STAT MAN 3 STA
[7]  
Kodkany BS, 2004, INT J FERTIL WOMEN M, V49, P91
[8]  
MOTASHAW ND, 1997, J FAM WELFARE, V43, P4
[10]   METHOD FOR CALCULATING BLOOD-LOSS AT VAGINAL DELIVERY [J].
NELSON, GH ;
ASHFORD, C ;
WILLIAMSON, R ;
AMBURN, SD .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 74 (05) :550-552