How do you define and measure research productivity?

被引:178
作者
Abramo, Giovanni [1 ]
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy, CNR, Inst Syst Anal & Comp Sci IASI, Lab Studies Res & Technol Transfer, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Engn & Management, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词
Research productivity; FSS; Research evaluation; University rankings; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; LIFE SCIENCES; CITATIONS; NATIONS; AUTHORS; IMPACT; ORDER; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Productivity is the quintessential indicator of efficiency in any production system. It seems it has become a norm in bibliometrics to define research productivity as the number of publications per researcher, distinguishing it from impact. In this work we operationalize the economic concept of productivity for the specific context of research activity and show the limits of the commonly accepted definition. We propose then a measurable form of research productivity through the indicator "Fractional Scientific Strength (FSS)", in keeping with the microeconomic theory of production. We present the methodology for measure of FSS at various levels of analysis: individual, field, discipline, department, institution, region and nation. Finally, we compare the ranking lists of Italian universities by the two definitions of research productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1144
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Di Costa, Flavia .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2008, 17 (02) :111-121
[2]  
Abramo G, 2007, CURR SCI INDIA, V93, P762
[3]   Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Di Costa, Flavia .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 68 (01) :69-85
[4]   Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Rosati, Francesco .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 97 (03) :779-795
[5]   Individual research performance: A proposal for comparing apples to oranges [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (02) :528-539
[6]   The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Rosati, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (01) :198-208
[7]   What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Cicero, Tindaro .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 93 (03) :1005-1017
[8]   Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (04) :470-479
[9]   Revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 63 (06) :701-717
[10]   A sensitivity analysis of researchers' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :192-201