An evaluation of long-term preservation methods for brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA samples

被引:107
作者
Murphy, MA
Waits, LP [1 ]
Kendall, KC
Wasser, SK
Higbee, JA
Bogden, R
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife Resources, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[2] USGS No Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Glacier Field Stn, W Glacier, MT 59936 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Zool, Ctr Conservat Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Amplicon Express, Pullman, WA 99163 USA
关键词
DNA extraction; DNA preservation; faecal DNA; noninvasive genetic sampling; PCR; Ursus arctos;
D O I
10.1023/A:1020503330767
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 [野生动植物保护与利用];
摘要
Relatively few large-scale faecal DNA studies have been initiated due to difficulties in amplifying low quality and quantity DNA template. To improve brown bear faecal DNA PCR amplification success rates and to determine post collection sample longevity, five preservation methods were evaluated: 90% ethanol, DETs buffer, silica-dried, oven-dried stored at room temperature, and oven-dried stored at -20degreesC. Preservation effectiveness was evaluated for 50 faecal samples by PCR amplification of a mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) locus (similar to146 bp) and a nuclear DNA (nDNA) locus (similar to 200 bp) at time points of one week, one month, three months and six months. Preservation method and storage time significantly impacted mtDNA and nDNA amplification success rates. For mtDNA, all preservation methods had greater than or equal to 75% success at one week, but storage time had a significant impact on the effectiveness of the silica preservation method. Ethanol preserved samples had the highest success rates for both mtDNA (86.5%) and nDNA (84%). Nuclear DNA amplification success rates ranged from 26-88%, and storage time had a significant impact on all methods but ethanol. Preservation method and storage time should be important considerations for researchers planning projects utilizing faecal DNA. We recommend preservation of faecal samples in 90% ethanol when feasible, although when collecting in remote field conditions or for both DNA and hormone assays a dry collection method may be advantageous.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 440
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA [J].
Frantzen, MAJ ;
Silk, JB ;
Ferguson, JWH ;
Wayne, RK ;
Kohn, MH .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1998, 7 (10) :1423-1428
[2]
AMPLIFICATION OF HYPERVARIABLE SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEATS (MICROSATELLITES) FROM EXCREMENTAL DNA OF WILD LIVING BONOBOS (PAN-PANISCUS) [J].
GERLOFF, U ;
SCHLOTTERER, C ;
RASSMANN, K ;
RAMBOLD, I ;
HOHMANN, G ;
FRUTH, B ;
TAUTZ, D .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1995, 4 (04) :515-518
[3]
A multi-samples, multi-extracts approach for microsatellite analysis of faecal samples in an arboreal ape [J].
Goossens B. ;
Chikhi L. ;
Utami S.S. ;
De Ruiter J. ;
Bruford M.W. .
Conservation Genetics, 2000, 1 (2) :157-162
[4]
Estimating population size by genotyping faeces [J].
Kohn, MH ;
York, EC ;
Kamradt, DA ;
Haugt, G ;
Sauvajot, RM ;
Wayne, RK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1420) :657-663
[5]
Facts from feces revisited [J].
Kohn, MH ;
Wayne, RK .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1997, 12 (06) :223-227
[6]
Murphy MA, 2000, WILDLIFE SOC B, V28, P951
[7]
MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION-STRUCTURE IN CANADIAN POLAR BEARS [J].
PAETKAU, D ;
CALVERT, W ;
STIRLING, I ;
STROBECK, C .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1995, 4 (03) :347-354
[8]
Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap [J].
Taberlet, P ;
Waits, LP ;
Luikart, G .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (08) :323-327
[9]
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR [J].
Taberlet, P ;
Griffin, S ;
Goossens, B ;
Questiau, S ;
Manceau, V ;
Escaravage, N ;
Waits, LP ;
Bouvet, J .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (16) :3189-3194
[10]
Techniques for application of faecal DNA methods to field studies of Ursids [J].
Wasser, SK ;
Houston, CS ;
Koehler, GM ;
Cadd, GG ;
Fain, SR .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1997, 6 (11) :1091-1097