Results of surgical removal of the pouch after failed restorative proctocolectomy

被引:45
作者
Karoui, M [1 ]
Cohen, R [1 ]
Nicholls, J [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, NW London Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Surg, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
restorative proctocolectomy; failure; pouch excision; morbidity;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-0536-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy is the elective surgical procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Most patients have a satisfactory outcome, but at ten years 15 percent or more will have failed, needing indefinite defunctioning or excision of the pouch. There is little information on the morbidity of pouch excision. The study was designed to present the early results of surgical removal of the pouch after failed restorative proctocolectomy with reference to the indications and intermediate complications, particularly of the perineal wound. METHODS: Between 1977 and 2002, 996 patients underwent a restorative proctocolectomy at our hospital and 245 patients were referred for potential salvage. The pouch was excised in 58 and 10 patients respectively. There were 40 females and 28 males (median age, 34 (1465) years) including 47 with ulcerative colitis, 10 with Crohn's disease, and I I with familial adenomatous polyposis. The median follow-up was 79 (range, 3-312) months from excision. RESULTS: There was one (1.4 percent) postoperative death. The overall morbidity rate was 62.3 percent (immediate 30 days (25 percent), late (53.7 percent)). Thirty-six patients (53.7 percent) were readmitted on 67 occasions for a late complication. The risk of readmission from the time of pouch excision was 38 and 58 percent at one and five years, respectively. Surgical treatment was required during 48 of these readmissions. A persistent perineal sinus was the most common late complication. The perineal wound was not healed at 6 months in 27 patients (40 percent) and at 12 months in 7 patients (10 percent). No factor, including age at the time of pouch excision, gender, indication for excision, or final histologic diagnosis, was associated with an unhealed perineal wound. Two males (7 percent) had impotence. One female suffered from short-bowel syndrome with the need of permanent parenteral nutrition. The median overall hospital stay for all admissions was 20 (range, 8-220) days. CONCLUSIONS: Pouch excision is associated with high morbidity. Perineal wound-delayed healing is the commonest late complication and often requires further surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 875
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PERINEAL WOUND-HEALING AFTER PROCTECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA AND INFLAMMATORY DISEASE [J].
BAUDOT, P ;
KEIGHLEY, MRB ;
ALEXANDERWILLIAMS, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 67 (04) :275-276
[2]  
Belliveau P, 1999, CAN J SURG, V42, P345
[3]   PERINEAL AND PELVIC MORBIDITY FOLLOWING PERIMUSCULAR EXCISION OF THE RECTUM FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE [J].
BERRY, AR ;
DECAMPOS, R ;
LEE, ECG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (08) :675-677
[4]  
DAUDE F, 1994, GASTROEN CLIN BIOL, V18, P462
[5]   Conversion of the failing ileoanal pouch to reservoir-ileostomy rather than to ileostomy alone [J].
Ecker, KWW ;
Haberer, M ;
Feifel, G .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (09) :977-980
[6]   ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSES COMPLICATIONS AND FUNCTION IN 1005 PATIENTS [J].
FAZIO, VW ;
ZIV, Y ;
CHURCH, JM ;
OAKLEY, JR ;
LAVERY, IC ;
MILSOM, JW ;
SCHROEDER, TK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (02) :120-127
[7]   Repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to salvage septic complications of pelvic pouches - Clinical outcome and quality of life assessment [J].
Fazio, VW ;
Wu, JS ;
Lavery, IC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) :588-595
[8]  
GEMLO BT, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P784
[9]   Outcome after septic complications in J pouch procedures [J].
Heuschen, UA ;
Allemeyer, EH ;
Hinz, U ;
Lucas, M ;
Herfarth, C ;
Heuschen, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (02) :194-200
[10]   THE FAILING PELVIC POUCH CONVERSION TO CONTINENT ILEOSTOMY [J].
HULTEN, L ;
FASTH, S ;
HALLGREN, T ;
ORESLAND, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1992, 7 (03) :119-121