Commercially available demineralized bone matrix compositions to regenerate calvarial critical-sized bone defects

被引:71
作者
Acarturk, Tahsin Oguz
Hollinger, Jeffrey O.
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Bone Tissue Engn Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000232385.81219.87
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Demineralized bone matrix products are often used by surgeons to regenerate bone. Several different types of carriers have been combined with demineralized bone matrix to improve clinical handling and surgical outcome. The aim of the study was to quantitate bone regeneration in standard-sized calvarial defects (a critical-sized defect) in response to commercially available demineralized bone matrix formulations. Methods: The commercial demineralized bone matrix formulations were tested as received in 8-mm-diameter calvarial critical-sized defects in an athymic rat model. The demineralized bone matrix treatment groups included the following: (1) Allomatrix; (2) demineralized bone matrix plus sodium hyaluronate (DBX); (3) DBX with poly (DL-lactide) mesh; 4) Dynagraft; (5) Grafton; (6) Regenafil; and (7) human demineralized bone matrix without a carrier. An eighth treatment was a poly(DL-lactide) mesh. At designated times of 2, 4, and 8 weeks, the critical-sized defects were recovered and processed for undecalcified histology and histomorphometry. Histomorphometric data were subjected to an analysis of valiance and Fisher's protected least significant difference multiple comparison test. Significance was established at p <= 0.05. Results: Allomatrix, Dynagraft, Regenafil, and poly (DL-lactide) mesh alone had less bone formation than DBX, Grafton, DBX plus mesh, and demineralized bone matrix. Conclusions: DBX, DBX plus mesh, demineralized bone matrix, and Grafton produced more bone formation than Allomatrix, Dynagraft, mesh alone, and Regenafil.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 873
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
RABBIT BONE-MATRIX INDUCES BONE-FORMATION IN THE ATHYMIC RAT [J].
ASPENBERG, P ;
THORNGREN, KG ;
LOHMANDER, LS .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 59 (03) :276-278
[2]
Bauer TW., 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V371, P10, DOI DOI 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003
[3]
BURGESS EA, 2001, PLASTIC SURG INDICAT, P657
[4]
Clinical applications of recombinant human BMPs: Early experience and future development [J].
Einhorn, TA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :82-88
[5]
IMPORTANCE OF BETA, TYPE-II ERROR AND SAMPLE-SIZE IN DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL - SURVEY OF 71 NEGATIVE TRIALS [J].
FREIMAN, JA ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
KUEBLER, RR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (13) :690-694
[6]
FROST H, 2002, ORTHOP NETWORK NEWS, V10, P10
[7]
Bone-graft substitutes: Facts, fictions, and applications [J].
Greenwald, AS ;
Boden, SD ;
Goldberg, VM ;
Khan, Y ;
Laurencin, CT ;
Rosier, RN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A :98-103
[8]
HARAKAS NK, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V188, P239
[9]
Hollinger J O, 1990, J Craniofac Surg, V1, P60, DOI 10.1097/00001665-199001000-00011
[10]
HOLLINGER JO, 1994, BONE REPAIR REGENERA, P463