Effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs on action monitoring in healthy volunteers

被引:136
作者
de Bruijn, Ellen R. A.
Sabbe, Bernard G. C.
Hulstijn, Wouter
Ruigt, Ge S. F.
Verkes, Robbert J.
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp VIB, Collaborat Antwerp Psychiat Res Inst, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Unit Clin Psychopharmacol & Neuropsychiat, Med Ctr, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
error-related negativity; ERN; action monitoring; haloperidol; olanzapine; paroxetine;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Humans need to monitor their actions continuously to detect errors as fast as possible and to adjust their performance to prevent future errors. This process of action monitoring can be investigated by measuring the error-related negativity (ERN), an ERP component elicited immediately after an error. In the current study, we investigated action monitoring after administration of the classic antipsychotic haloperidol (2.5 mg), the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (10 mg), and the antidepressant paroxetine (20 mg), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Healthy volunteers (N = 14) were administered the three compounds and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, four-way cross-over design. All participants performed a speeded two-choice reaction task, while event-related potentials and behavioral measurements were obtained. Both haloperidol and olanzapine significantly reduced ERN amplitudes. After paroxetine, the ERN was not different from placebo. N2 congruency effects were not affected by treatment condition. Only olanzapine demonstrated behavioral effects, namely a slowing of responses, an increase in error rates, and the absence of performance adjustments. The attenuated ERNs after the dopamine antagonist haloperidol are in line with the presumed role of dopamine in action monitoring. Haloperidol is thought to block dopaminergic signaling, thus reducing ERN amplitudes. On the other hand, the effects of olanzapine are mainly caused by its sedative side effects, leading to a decline in motivation and appraisal of errors. Finally, the absence of any effects after paroxetine suggests that serotonin transmission does not play a direct role in regulating mechanisms related to action monitoring. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 129
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Error-related negativity and correct response negativity in schizophrenia [J].
Bates, AT ;
Kiehl, KA ;
Laurens, KR ;
LIddle, PF .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (09) :1454-1463
[2]
Serotonin 2a receptor T102C polymorphism and impaired impulse control [J].
Bjork, JM ;
Moeller, FG ;
Dougherty, DM ;
Swann, AC ;
Machado, MA ;
Hanis, CL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2002, 114 (03) :336-339
[3]
Altered response evaluation - Monitoring of late responses after administration of D-amphetamine [J].
de Bruijn, ERA ;
Hulstijn, W ;
Verkes, RJ ;
Ruigt, GSF ;
Sabbe, BGC .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) :311-318
[4]
Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers [J].
de Bruijn, ERA ;
Hulstijn, W ;
Verkes, RJ ;
Ruigt, GSF ;
Sabbe, BGC .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 177 (1-2) :151-160
[5]
DEBRUIJN ERA, IN PRESS J PSYCHIAT
[6]
EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[7]
EFFECTS OF CROSSMODAL DIVIDED ATTENTION ON LATE ERP COMPONENTS .2. ERROR PROCESSING IN CHOICE REACTION TASKS [J].
FALKENSTEIN, M ;
HOHNSBEIN, J ;
HOORMANN, J ;
BLANKE, L .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 78 (06) :447-455
[8]
Falkenstein M, 1995, EEG CL N SU, P287
[9]
Action-monitoring dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder [J].
Gehring, WJ ;
Himle, J ;
Nisenson, LG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (01) :1-6
[10]
A NEURAL SYSTEM FOR ERROR-DETECTION AND COMPENSATION [J].
GEHRING, WJ ;
GOSS, B ;
COLES, MGH ;
MEYER, DE ;
DONCHIN, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (06) :385-390