Efficacy of CPT-11 (irinotecan) as a single agent in metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:38
作者
Shimada, Y
Rougier, P
Pitot, H
机构
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 USA
[2] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY, VILLEJUIF, FRANCE
关键词
CPT-11; phase II; colorectal cancer;
D O I
10.1016/0959-8049(96)00292-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The efficacy of CPT-11 (Campto(R), irinotecan) given as a single agent has been assessed in three phase II clinical studies of patients with advanced colorectal cancer conducted in Japan, Europe and the U.S. Among a total of 337 evaluable patients treated with CPT-11 in dosage schedules of 100-150 mg/m(2) weekly or bi-weekly (Japan, n=63; U.S., n=118) or 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (Europe, n=156), overall objective response rates ranged from 17 to 27% and the median duration of response was approximately 7-9 months. Prior treatment with chemotherapy did not preclude a response to CPT-11 as evidenced by response rates of 14 to 22% and response durations of approximately 6-8 months in this cohort. In the European study, comparison of chemotherapy-naive patients with those who had received only one 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimen revealed similar response rates (22 and 20%) and of note, CPT-11 maintained its activity in pretreated patients who had previously experienced progressive disease. Together, these results suggest a lack of cross-resistance between the two agents. Leucopenia and delayed diarrhoea were the major adverse events observed in these studies, with grade 3-4 events occurring in 15-36% and 13-47% of patients, respectively. CPT-11, therefore, has significant activity in advanced colorectal cancer with response rates that are reproducible, durable and comparable to those achieved with 5-FU plus folinic acid in the first-line treatment of metastatic disease. Further work is needed to define the optimum dosage schedule for CPT-11 and also to assess fully the utility of CPT-11 in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Nevertheless, the activity of CPT-11 in patients refractory to treatment with 5-FU may be considered a significant advance, making it the first effective second-line agent in this setting. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:S13 / S17
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   PHASE-I AND PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE CAMPTOTHECIN ANALOG IRINOTECAN ADMINISTERED EVERY 3 WEEKS IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
ABIGERGES, D ;
CHABOT, GG ;
ARMAND, JP ;
HERAIT, P ;
GOUYETTE, A ;
GANDIA, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (01) :210-221
[2]  
ADENIS A, 1993, B CANCER, V80, pS65
[3]  
Armand JP, 1996, SEMIN ONCOL, V23, P27
[4]   Characterisation and clinical management of CPT-11 (irinotecan)-induced adverse events: The European perspective [J].
Bleiberg, H ;
Cvitkovic, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A :S18-S23
[5]   PHASE-I AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF IRINOTECAN (CPT-11) ADMINISTERED DAILY FOR 3 CONSECUTIVE DAYS EVERY 3 WEEKS IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS [J].
CATIMEL, G ;
CHABOT, GG ;
GUASTALLA, JP ;
DUMORTIER, A ;
COTE, C ;
ENGEL, C ;
GOUYETTE, A ;
MATHIEUBOUE, A ;
MAHJOUBI, M ;
CLAVEL, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) :133-140
[6]  
Cohen AM, 1993, Cancer: principles and practice o f oncology, P929
[7]  
DEFORNI M, 1994, CANCER RES, V54, P4347
[8]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF FLUOROURACIL AND FOLINIC ACID IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
ERLICHMAN, C ;
FINE, S ;
WONG, A ;
ELHAKIM, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (03) :469-475
[9]   DNA TOPOISOMERASE-I TARGETED CHEMOTHERAPY OF HUMAN-COLON CANCER IN XENOGRAFTS [J].
GIOVANELLA, BC ;
STEHLIN, JS ;
WALL, ME ;
WANI, MC ;
NICHOLAS, AW ;
LIU, LF ;
SILBER, R ;
POTMESIL, M .
SCIENCE, 1989, 246 (4933) :1046-1048
[10]   EXPECTANCY OR PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED ASYMPTOMATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
GLIMELIUS, B ;
PAHLMAN, L ;
GRAF, W ;
ADAMI, HO ;
TVEIT, K ;
HANSEN, J ;
LILJEGREN, G ;
DOMELoF, L ;
LJUNGQVIST, U ;
BERGMAN, L ;
ENANDER, LK ;
UNDERSKOG, I ;
SoDERBERG, M ;
JoNSSON, PE ;
HAFSTRoM, L ;
HEUMAN, R ;
ATHLIN, L ;
SASSNER, P ;
SELLSTRoM, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (06) :904-911