Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks

被引:654
作者
Lyytinen, Kalle [1 ]
Yoo, Youngjin [2 ,3 ]
Boland, Richard J., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Management, Management Informat Syst, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Management, Ctr Design Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
digitization; innovation; networks; knowledge flows; cognition; social integration; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; ORGANIZING LOGIC; KNOWLEDGE; INFRASTRUCTURES; DIFFUSION; DYNAMICS; DESIGN; COLLABORATION; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.1111/isj.12093
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The increased digitization of organizational processes and products poses new challenges for understanding product innovation. It also opens new horizons for information systems research. We analyse how ongoing pervasive digitization of product innovation reshapes knowledge creation and sharing in innovation networks. We argue that advances in digital technologies (1) increase innovation network connectivity by reducing communication costs and increasing its reach and scope and (2) increase the speed and scope of digital convergence, which increases network knowledge heterogeneity and need for integration. These developments, in turn, stretch existing innovation networks by redistributing control and increasing the demand for knowledge coordination across time and space presenting novel challenges for knowledge creation, assimilation and integration. Based on this foundation, we distinguish four types of emerging innovation networks supported by digitalization: (1) project innovation networks; (2) clan innovation networks; (3) federated innovation networks; and (4) anarchic innovation networks. Each network involves different cognitive and social translations - or ways of identifying, sharing and assimilating knowledge. We describe the role of five novel properties of digital infrastructures in supporting each type of innovation network: representational flexibility, semantic coherence, temporal and spatial traceability, knowledge brokering and linguistic calibration. We identify several implications for future innovation research. In particular, we focus on the emergence of anarchic network forms that follow full-fledged digital convergence founded on richer innovation ontologies and epistemologies calling to critically re-examine the nature and impact of modularization for innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 75
页数:29
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Network structure in virtual organizations [J].
Ahuja, MK ;
Carley, KM .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (06) :741-757
[2]  
Al'tshuller G., 1988, Creativity as an exact science. The theory of the solution of inventive problems
[3]  
[Anonymous], J STRATEGIC INFORM S
[4]  
[Anonymous], P 34 ICIS MIL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009278 COM COMM EUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 28 INT C INF SYST
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OPEN INNOVATION RES
[8]  
[Anonymous], J ASS INFORM SYSTEMS
[9]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
[10]  
[Anonymous], ARCHITECTURAL RECORD