Effects of recruitment strategies and demographic factors on inclusion in a large scale vaccination trial in adults 65 years and older

被引:4
作者
Smorenburg, Andre J. [1 ]
Oosterman, Bas J. [1 ]
Grobbee, Diederick E. [1 ,2 ]
Bonten, Marc J. M. [2 ,3 ]
Roes, Kit C. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Julius Clin, NL-3703 CD Zeist, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Microbiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Recruitment; Inclusion; Elderly; Travel; Vaccination trial; Age; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SAMPLE-SIZE; BARRIERS; PARTICIPATION; PREDICTORS; RETENTION; DESIGN; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.081
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Large-scale randomized studies generate the highest level evidence for medical interventions. Yet, successful recruitment frequently is challenging, especially when targeting elderly populations. Although several studies investigated specific recruitment barriers, there is little quantitative understanding of such barriers. We therefore determined associations between patient related and study-related factors and study inclusion in healthy elderly (>65 years) invited to participate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study to determine effectiveness and safety of a 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine for community-acquired pneumonia in the Netherlands. Inclusions for this study took place between September 2008 and January 2010. The analysis was performed on replies to invitations sent between February 2009 and October 2009. In our analyses 260,700 replies from this period resulted in 48,982 candidates included in the study (18.8%). Study inclusion was associated with travel time to the vaccination site (decline of 0.6% per 4 min travel time, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.972, 95% CI 0.964-0.980), number of published advertorials in local newspapers (increase of 0.4% per consecutively placed advertorial, adjusted OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.026-1.035), age (decline of 0.7% per year, adjusted OR 0.953, 95% CI 0.951-0.955) and male gender (adjusted OR 0.588 versus female, 95% Cl 0.576-0.599). Introduction letters sent on behalf of general practitioners prior to the actual invitation letter were not associated with study inclusion. Careful consideration of these parameters in study preparation may facilitate more successful patient recruitment in clinical trials in healthy elderly. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2989 / 2994
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Administration on Aging U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009, PROF OLD AM 2009
[2]   Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors [J].
Baquet, CR ;
Commiskey, P ;
Mullins, CD ;
Mishra, SI .
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2006, 30 (01) :24-33
[3]   Primary prevention studies and the healthy elderly: Evaluating barriers to recruitment [J].
Boles, M ;
Getchell, WS ;
Feldman, G ;
McBride, R ;
Hart, RG .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 25 (04) :279-292
[4]   Recruitment and retention of elderly patients in clinical trials -: Issues and strategies [J].
Cassidy, EL ;
Baird, E ;
Sheikh, JI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 9 (02) :136-140
[5]   APPLYING RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS TO CLINICAL-PRACTICE - IMPACT OF LOSSES BEFORE RANDOMIZATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
HORWITZ, RI .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6454) :1281-1284
[6]   Recruitment of rural community-dwelling older adults: barriers, challenges, and strategies [J].
Dibartolo, MC ;
McCrone, S .
AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2003, 7 (02) :75-82
[7]   What makes clinical research ethical? [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Wendler, D ;
Grady, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20) :2701-2711
[8]   Recruiting older people to a randomised controlled dietary intervention trial - how hard can it be? [J].
Forster, Sarah E. ;
Jones, Laura ;
Saxton, John M. ;
Flower, Daniel J. ;
Foulds, Gemma ;
Powers, Hilary J. ;
Parker, Stuart G. ;
Pockley, A. Graham ;
Williams, Elizabeth A. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
[9]   IMPORTANCE OF BETA, TYPE-II ERROR AND SAMPLE-SIZE IN DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL - SURVEY OF 71 NEGATIVE TRIALS [J].
FREIMAN, JA ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
KUEBLER, RR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (13) :690-694
[10]  
Giannakouris K, REGIONAL POPULATION