Time-based competition in multistage manufacturing: Stream-of-variation analysis (SOVA) methodology - review

被引:112
作者
Ceglarek, D [1 ]
Huang, W
Zhou, S
Ding, Y
Kumar, R
Zhou, Y
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind Engn, 1513 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ind Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Dimens Control Syst Inc, Troy, MI 48084 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS | 2004年 / 16卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
variation reduction; quality; root cause identification; manufacturing systems;
D O I
10.1023/B:FLEX.0000039171.25141.a4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Frequency of model change and the vast amounts of time and cost required to make a changeover, also called time-based competition, has become a characteristic feature of modern manufacturing and new product development in automotive, aerospace, and other industries. This paper discusses the concept of time-based competition in manufacturing and design based on a review of on-going research related to stream-of-variation (SOVA or SoV) methodology. The SOVA methodology focuses on the development of modeling, analysis, and control of dimensional variation in complex multistage assembly processes ( MAP) such as the automotive, aerospace, appliance, and electronics industries. The presented methodology can help in eliminating costly trial-and-error fine-tuning of new-product assembly processes attributable to unforeseen dimensional errors throughout the assembly process from design through ramp-up and production. Implemented during the product design phase, the method will produce math-based predictions of potential downstream assembly problems, based on evaluations of the design and a large array of process variables. By integrating product and process design in a pre-production simulation, SOVA can head off individual assembly errors that contribute to an accumulating set of dimensional variations, which ultimately result in out-of-tolerance parts and products. Once in the ramp-up stage of production, SOVA will be able to compare predicted misalignments with actual measurements to determine the degree of mismatch in the assemblies, diagnose the root causes of errors, isolate the sources from other assembly steps, and then, on the basis of the SOVA model and product measurements, recommend solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 44
页数:34
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Diagnosis of multiple fixture faults in panel assembly [J].
Apley, DW ;
Shi, J .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1998, 120 (04) :793-801
[2]  
BARON J, 1992, THESIS U MICHIGAN AN
[3]  
BOLLINGER J, 1998, VISIONARY MANUFACTUR
[4]   Deformable sheet metal fixturing: Principles, algorithms, and simulations [J].
Cai, W ;
Hu, SJ ;
Yuan, JX .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (03) :318-324
[5]   Modeling variation propagation of multi-station assembly systems with compliant parts [J].
Camelio, J ;
Hu, SJ ;
Ceglarek, D .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2003, 125 (04) :673-681
[6]   Knowledge-based diagnostic approach for the launch of the auto-body assembly process [J].
Ceglarek, D. ;
Shi, J. ;
Wu, S.M. .
Journal of engineering for industry, 1994, 116 (04) :491-499
[7]   Fixture failure diagnosis for autobody assembly using pattern recognition [J].
Ceglarek, D ;
Shi, J .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (01) :55-66
[8]   Design evaluation of sheet metal joints for dimensional integrity [J].
Ceglarek, D ;
Shi, J .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1998, 120 (02) :452-460
[9]  
Ceglarek D., 1995, Manufacturing Review Journal, V8, P139
[10]  
CEGLAREK DJ, 1994, THESIS U MICHIGAN AN