Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes

被引:34
作者
Bailit, JL [1 ]
Garrett, JM
Miller, WC
McMahon, MJ
Cefalo, RC
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
risk adjustment; cesarean delivery; outcome;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.125886
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether risk-adjusted hospital primary cesarean delivery rates are associated with poor neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The Washington State Birth Events Records for 1995 and 1996 were used. Predicted primary cesarean delivery rates were calculated for each hospital. Women were divided by whether the hospital had an actual primary cesarean delivery rate below, within, or greater than the predicted Cl. Asphyxia (a lack of oxygen that leads to organ damage) was used as a marker of poor neonatal outcome. Risk of neonatal asphyxia was compared for each of the 3 cesarean rating groups. RESULTS: The risk for asphyxia among infants who were born to women who delivered at hospitals that had more, within, or fewer cesarean deliveries than predicted were 0.58%, 0.17%, and 0.33%, respectively (P <. 0001). CONCLUSION: Infants born to women who delivered at hospitals that had more than or fewer than the predicted number of primary cesarean deliveries experienced a greater risk of neonatal asphyxia.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 727
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance [J].
Aron, DC ;
Harper, DL ;
Shepardson, LB ;
Rosenthal, GE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (24) :1968-1972
[2]   Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates [J].
Bailit, JL ;
Dooley, SL ;
Peaceman, AN .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06) :1025-1030
[3]   Prospective validation of a scoring system for predicting neonatal morbidity after acute perinatal asphyxia [J].
Carter, BS ;
McNabb, F ;
Merenstein, GB .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1998, 132 (04) :619-623
[4]  
HOHNER V, 1990, BIRTH EVENTS RECORDS
[5]  
Iezzoni LI., 1997, RISK ADJUSTMENT MEAS, V2nd
[6]  
Keeler EB, 1997, HEALTH SERV RES, V32, P511
[7]   A REVIEW OF GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC-REGRESSION MODELS [J].
LEMESHOW, S ;
HOSMER, DW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 115 (01) :92-106
[8]   MOTOR AND COGNITIVE DEFICITS AFTER INTRAPARTUM ASPHYXIA IN THE MATURE FETUS [J].
LOW, JA ;
GALBRAITH, RS ;
MUIR, DW ;
KILLEN, HL ;
PATER, EA ;
KARCHMAR, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (02) :356-361
[9]  
LOW JA, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P57
[10]   MATERNAL MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY IN CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
PETITTI, DB .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 28 (04) :763-769