The use of methohexital during chest tube removal in neonates

被引:8
作者
Allegaert, K
Naulaers, G
Debeer, A
Breysem, L
Ferens, I
Vanhole, C
Devlieger, H
Tibboel, D
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Paediat, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Erasmus MC, Sophia Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Sophia Childrens Hosp, Pain Res Grp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
methohexital; neonates; chest tube; procedural pain relief;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01187.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of the study was the evaluation of the effect of methohexital during chest tube removal (CTR) in neonates. Methods: Evaluation was based on the degree of sedation (grades 1-4) and relaxation (grades 1-4) and trends in vital signs heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation at time points (-10, -5, -3, -1, 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 min) before and after administration of methohexital. A multidimensional pain scale [Leuven Neonatal Pain Scale (LNPS)] was used to evaluate pain expression. Effective sedation and relaxation (grade >2) would enable the physician to perform CTR without difficulties. Paired Wilcoxon was used to compare vital signs and pain expression before and after the procedure. Results: Twenty-two procedures in 22 infants were recorded. Eleven infants were ventilated and 21 infants were having intravenous analgesics during CTR. Birth weight was 2645 g (range 1235-4500 g). Postnatal age was 6 days (range 1-80 days). Methohexital had no effect on ventilatory weaning, MAP or oxygen saturation. Heart rate increased from 144 (49) to 162 (43) (P = 0.012) b(.)min(-1). Sedation and relaxation were effective (>grade 2) and lasted for <5 min. No major side effects were documented. Adequate analgesia by LNPS was more difficult to evaluate as clinical pain evaluation was not feasible during full muscular relaxation. Conclusions: Administration of methohexital for CTR resulted in adequate sedation and relaxation without major side effects in neonates. This approach should be compared with other strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 312
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Systematic evaluation of pain in neonates: effect on the number of intravenous analgesics prescribed [J].
Allegaert, K ;
Tibboel, D ;
Naulaers, G ;
Tison, D ;
De Jonge, A ;
Van Dijk, M ;
Vanhole, C ;
Devlieger, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 59 (02) :87-90
[2]   The use of methohexital during neonatal cardioversion [J].
Allegaert, K ;
Naulaers, G ;
Gewillig, M ;
Devlieger, H .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (04) :371-373
[3]   Clinical importance of pain and stress in preterm neonates [J].
Anand, KJS .
BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE, 1998, 73 (01) :1-9
[4]   Consensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn [J].
Anand, KJS .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2001, 155 (02) :173-180
[5]   EXPOSURE TO INVASIVE PROCEDURES IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT ADMISSIONS [J].
BARKER, DP ;
RUTTER, N .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1995, 72 (01) :F47-F48
[6]   Isoflurane for removal of chest drains after cardiac surgery [J].
Bryden, FMM ;
McFarlane, H ;
Tunstall, ME ;
Ross, JAS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (02) :173-175
[7]  
CARSON MM, 1994, HEART LUNG, V23, P500
[8]  
Kinney M R, 1995, Am J Crit Care, V4, P419
[9]  
Mackenzie JW, 1997, ANAESTHESIA, V52, P718
[10]   LOW-DOSE PROPOFOL FOR CHEST TUBE REMOVAL [J].
MCMURRAY, TJ ;
BHANUMURTHY, S ;
GROOGAN, F .
ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (06) :566-566