Three-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

被引:156
作者
Aus, G [1 ]
Abrahamsson, PA
Ahlgren, G
Hugosson, J
Lundberg, S
Schain, M
Schelin, S
Pedersen, K
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Rhyov Hosp, Dept Urol, Jonkoping, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Kristianstad Hosp, Dept Urol, Kristianstad, Sweden
[5] Kalmar Cty Hosp, Dept Urol, Kalmar, Sweden
[6] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[7] Rhyov Hosp, Dept Pathol, Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
prostate cancer; treatment; radical prostatectomy; hormonal therapy; follow-up; randomized trial;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02982.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To describe the outcome, assessed as the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA), of a mature (more than half the events recorded) prospective randomized study with a median follow-up of 82 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy, as this has been suggested to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins (i.e. provide greater potential to completely excise the tumour). Patient and methods From December 1991 to March 1994, 126 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were randomized between direct radical prostatectomy or a 3-month course of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue before surgery. The patients were followed by PSA determinations and a value of > 0.5 ng/mL used to define progression. Results The incidence of positive surgical margins decreased from 45.5% to 23.6% (P = 0.016) with hormone treatment. Despite this there was no difference in PSA progression-free survival at the last follow-up; it was 51.5% for those undergoing radical prostatectomy only and 49.8% for those who received hormonal pretreatment (P = 0.588). Conclusions Three months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy offers no benefit to the patient and cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 566
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: What is the most appropriate cut point?
    Amling, CL
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Blute, ML
    Slezak, JM
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) : 1146 - 1151
  • [2] Hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy: A 3-year followup
    Aus, G
    Abrahamsson, PA
    Ahlgren, G
    Hugosson, J
    Lundberg, S
    Schain, M
    Schelin, S
    Pedersen, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (06) : 2013 - 2016
  • [3] Morphologic changes induced by neoadjuvant androgen ablation may result in underdetection of positive surgical margins and capsular involvement by prostatic adenocarcinoma
    Bazinet, M
    Zheng, W
    Begin, LR
    Aprikian, AG
    Karakiewicz, PI
    Elhilali, MM
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (05) : 721 - 725
  • [4] Civantos F, 1999, MOL UROL, V3, P201
  • [5] Randomized study of neoadjuvant testicular androgen ablation therapy before radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Dalkin, BL
    Ahmann, FR
    Nagle, R
    Johnson, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04) : 1357 - 1360
  • [6] Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor
    Epstein, JI
    Pound, CR
    Partin, AW
    Walsh, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (01) : 97 - 100
  • [7] Fair WR, 2000, MOL UROL, V4, P241
  • [8] FLAMM J, 1991, EUR UROL, V19, P192
  • [9] PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING
    GLEASON, DF
    MELLINGE.GT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [10] Long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of risk for biochemical recurrence at 5-year follow-up
    Gleave, ME
    La Bianca, SE
    Goldenberg, SL
    Jones, EC
    Bruchovsky, N
    Sullivan, LD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (02) : 289 - 294