Prostate cancer: Localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging - Clinicopathologic study

被引:413
作者
Scheidler, J
Hricak, H
Vigneron, DB
Yu, KK
Sokolov, DL
Huang, LR
Zaloudek, CJ
Nelson, SJ
Carroll, PR
Kurhanewicz, J
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); spectroscopy; three-dimensional; prostate; hyperplasia; MR; neoplasms;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv23473
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, examinations were performed in 53 patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer and subsequent radical prostatectomy with step-section histopathologic examination. The prostate was divided into sextants. At MR imaging, the presence or absence of cancer in the peripheral zone of each sextant was assessed independently by two readers (readers 1 and 2) unaware of the findings at 3D MR spectroscopic imaging and histopathologic examination. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was diagnosed as possible if the ratio of choline plus creatine to citrate exceeded 2 SD above population norms or as definite if that ratio exceeded 3 SDs above the norm. RESULTS: On the basis of sextants, sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for MR imaging were 77% and 61% (reader 1) and 81% and 46% (reader 2) with moderate interreader agreement (kappa = 0.43). The 3D MR spectroscopic imaging diagnosis of definite cancer had significantly higher specificity (75%, P < .05) but lower sensitivity (63%, P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed significantly (P < .001) improved tumor localization for both readers when 3D MR spectroscopic imaging was added to MR imaging. High specificity (up to 91%) was obtained when combined MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging indicated cancer, whereas high sensitivity (up to 95%) was obtained when either test alone indicated a positive result. CONCLUSION: The addition of 3D MR spectroscopic imaging to MR imaging provides better detection and localization of prostate cancer in a sextant of the prostate than does use of MR imaging alone.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 480
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] INTERSTITIAL LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROSTATIC-CANCER
    AMIN, Z
    LEES, WR
    BOWN, SG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (791) : 1044 - 1047
  • [2] NONINVASIVE DIFFERENTIATION OF TUMORS WITH USE OF LOCALIZED H-1 MR SPECTROSCOPY INVIVO - INITIAL EXPERIENCE IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL-TUMORS
    BRUHN, H
    FRAHM, J
    GYNGELL, ML
    MERBOLDT, KD
    HANICKE, W
    SAUTER, R
    HAMBURGER, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 172 (02) : 541 - 548
  • [3] Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: Effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging
    Chen, M
    Hricak, H
    Kalbhen, CL
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Vigneron, DB
    Weiss, JM
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (05) : 1157 - 1163
  • [4] RESULTS OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    CHODAK, GW
    THISTED, RA
    GERBER, GS
    JOHANSSON, JE
    ADOLFSSON, J
    JONES, GW
    CHISHOLM, GD
    MOSKOVITZ, B
    LIVNE, PM
    WARNER, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (04) : 242 - 248
  • [5] MATCHMAKING AND MCNEMAR IN THE COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC MODALITIES
    DWYER, AJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (02) : 328 - 330
  • [6] APPLICATION OF INVIVO NMR-SPECTROSCOPY TO CANCER
    EVANOCHKO, WT
    NG, TC
    GLICKSON, JD
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1984, 1 (04) : 508 - 534
  • [7] A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) : 839 - 843
  • [8] CANCER WITH ENDORECTAL MR-IMAGING - LESSONS FROM A LEARNING-CURVE
    HARRIS, RD
    SCHNED, AR
    HEANEY, JA
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1995, 15 (04) : 813 - 829
  • [9] CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE-GLAND - MR-IMAGING WITH PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS VERSUS INTEGRATED ENDORECTAL PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS
    HRICAK, H
    WHITE, S
    VIGNERON, D
    KURHANEWICZ, J
    KOSCO, A
    LEVIN, D
    WEISS, J
    NARAYAN, P
    CARROLL, PR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) : 703 - 709
  • [10] Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: Correlation with histopathology
    Jager, GJ
    Ruijter, ETG
    vandeKaa, CA
    delaRosette, JJMCH
    Oosterhof, GON
    Thornbury, JR
    Barentsz, JO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) : 845 - 852