Endothelial actin and cell stiffness is modulated by substrate stiffness in 2D and 3D

被引:188
作者
Byfield, Fitzroy J. [2 ]
Reen, Rashmeet K. [1 ]
Shentu, Tzu-Pin [3 ]
Levitan, Irena [3 ]
Gooch, Keith J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Inst Med & Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Sect Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Modulus; Biomechanics; Actin; Endothelial cell; Stiffness; Extracellular matrix; CAPILLARY MORPHOGENESIS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CYTOSKELETAL TENSION; RIGIDITY; ELASTICITY; ADHESIONS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.012
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
There is a growing appreciation of the profound effects that passive mechanical properties, especially the stiffness of the local environment, can have on cellular functions. Many experiments are conducted in a 2D geometry (i.e., cells grown on top of substrates of varying stiffness), which is a simplification of the 3D environment often experienced by cells in vivo. To determine how matrix dimensionality might modulate the effect of matrix stiffness on actin and cell stiffness, endothelial cells were cultured on top of and within substrates of various stiffnesses. Endothelial cells were cultured within compliant (1.0-1.5mg/ml, 124 +/- 8 to 202 +/- 27Pa) and stiff (3.0mg/ml, 502 +/- 48Pa) type-I collagen gels. Cells elongated and formed microvascular-like networks in both sets of gels as seen in previous studies. Cells in stiffer gels exhibited more pronounced stress fibers and similar to 1.5-fold greater staining for actin. As actin is a major determinant of a cell's mechanical properties, we hypothesized that cells in stiff gels will themselves be stiffer. To test this hypothesis, cells were isolated from the gels and their stiffness was assessed using micropipette aspiration. Cells isolated from relatively compliant gels were 1.9-fold more compliant than cells isolated from relatively stiff gels (p<0.05). Similarly, cells cultured on top of 1700Pa polyacrylamide gels were 2.0-fold more compliant that those cultured on 9000Pa (p<0.05). These data demonstrate that extracellular substrate stiffness regulates endothelial stiffness in both three- and two-dimensional environments, though the range of stiffnesses that cells respond to vary significantly in different environments. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1119
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Cholesterol depletion increases membrane stiffness of aortic endothelial cells [J].
Byfield, FJ ;
Aranda-Espinoza, H ;
Romanenko, VG ;
Rothblat, GH ;
Levitan, I .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 87 (05) :3336-3343
[2]   Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension [J].
Cukierman, E ;
Pankov, R ;
Stevens, DR ;
Yamada, KM .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5547) :1708-1712
[3]   Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate [J].
Discher, DE ;
Janmey, P ;
Wang, YL .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5751) :1139-1143
[4]   The nucleation of receptor-mediated endocytosis [J].
Edwards, DA ;
Gooch, KJ ;
Zhang, I ;
McKinley, GH ;
Langer, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (05) :1786-1791
[5]   Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses [J].
Engler, A ;
Bacakova, L ;
Newman, C ;
Hategan, A ;
Griffin, M ;
Discher, D .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) :617-628
[6]   Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification [J].
Engler, Adam J. ;
Sen, Shamik ;
Sweeney, H. Lee ;
Discher, Dennis E. .
CELL, 2006, 126 (04) :677-689
[7]   Neurite branching on deformable substrates [J].
Flanagan, LA ;
Ju, YE ;
Marg, B ;
Osterfield, M ;
Janmey, PA .
NEUROREPORT, 2002, 13 (18) :2411-2415
[8]   Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices [J].
Grinnell, F .
TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :264-269
[9]   MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF THE EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX INFLUENCE FIBRONECTIN FIBRIL ASSEMBLY IN-VITRO [J].
HALLIDAY, NL ;
TOMASEK, JJ .
EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 1995, 217 (01) :109-117
[10]   Micropipette aspiration of living cells [J].
Hochmuth, RM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (01) :15-22