Use of drought response index for identification of drought tolerant genotypes in rainfed lowland rice

被引:79
作者
Ouk, Makara [1 ]
Basnayake, J.
Tsubo, M.
Fukai, S.
Fischer, K. S.
Cooper, M.
Nesbitt, H.
机构
[1] CARDI, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Land & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Pioneer, DuPont Agr & Nutr, Johnston, IA 50131 USA
关键词
rainfed lowland; drought response index; yield potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.003
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Drought is a major constraint for rice production in the rainfed lowlands in Southeast Asia and Eastern India. The breeding programs for tainted lowland rice in these regions focus on adaptation to a range of drought conditions. However, a method of selection of drought tolerant genotypes has not been established and is considered to be one of the constraints faced by rice breeders. Drought response index (DRI) is based on grain yield adjusted for variation in potential yield and flowering date, and has been used recently, but its consistency among drought environments and hence its usefulness is not certain. In order to establish a selection method and subsequently to identify donor parents for drought resistance breeding, a series of experiments with 15 contrasting genotypes was conducted under well-watered and managed drought conditions at two sites for 5 years in Cambodia. Water level in the field was recorded and used to estimate the relative water level (WLREL) around flowering as an index of the severity of water deficit at the time of flowering for each entry. This was used to determine if DRI or yield reduction was due to drought tolerance or related to the amount of available water at flowering, i.e. drought escape. Grain yield reduction due to drought ranged from 12 to 46%. The drought occurred mainly during the reproductive phase, while four experiments had water stress from the early vegetative stage. There was significant variation for water availability around flowering among the nine experiments and this was associated with variation in mean yield reduction. Genotypic variation in DRI was consistent among most experiments, and genotypic mean DRI ranged from -0.54 to 0.47 (LSD 5% = 0.47). Genotypic variation in DRI was not related to WLREL around flowering in the nine environments. It is concluded that selection for DRI under drought conditions would allow breeders to identify donor lines with high drought tolerance as an important component of breeding better adapted varieties for the rainfed lowlands; two genotypes were identified with high DRI and low yield reduction and were subsequently used in the breeding program in Cambodia. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 58
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Comparison of selection indices to identify productive dry bean lines under diverse environmental conditions [J].
Abebe, A ;
Brick, MA ;
Kirkby, RA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1998, 58 (01) :15-23
[2]  
BASNAYAKE J, 1934, P 4 INT CROP SCI C B, P239
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE IN PEARL-MILLET [PENNISETUM-AMERICANUM (L) LEEKE] .1. FACTORS AFFECTING YIELDS UNDER STRESS [J].
BIDINGER, FR ;
MAHALAKSHMI, V ;
RAO, GDP .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1987, 38 (01) :37-48
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE IN PEARL-MILLET [PENNISETUM-AMERICANUM (L) LEEKE] .2. ESTIMATION OF GENOTYPE RESPONSE TO STRESS [J].
BIDINGER, FR ;
MAHALAKSHMI, V ;
RAO, GDP .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1987, 38 (01) :49-59
[5]   DEVELOPMENT OF DROUGHT-RESISTANT CULTIVARS USING PHYSIO-MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS IN RICE [J].
FUKAI, S ;
COOPER, M .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1995, 40 (02) :67-86
[6]   SCREENING RICE FOR DROUGHT RESISTANCE AT THE REPRODUCTIVE PHASE [J].
GARRITY, DP ;
OTOOLE, JC .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1994, 39 (2-3) :99-110
[7]  
IMMARK S, 1997, BREEDING STRATEGIES, V77, P89
[8]  
INTHAPANYA P, 2001, INCREASED RAINFED LO, V101, P191
[9]   Growth and grain yield of contrasting rice cultivars grown under different conditions of water availability [J].
Jearakongman, S ;
Rajatasereekul, S ;
Naklang, K ;
Romyen, P ;
Fukai, S ;
Skulkhu, E ;
Jumpaket, B ;
Nathabutr, K .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1995, 44 (2-3) :139-150
[10]  
JONGDEE S, 1997, ACIAR P, V77, P65