Aerodynamic Characteristics of Nebulized Terbutaline Sulphate Using the Next Generation Impactor (NGI) and CEN Method

被引:45
作者
Abdelrahim, Mohamed E. [2 ,3 ]
Chrystyn, Henry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Huddersfield, Div Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Sch Appl Sci, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Bradford, Inst Pharmaceut Innovat, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Bani Suef, Fac Pharm, Bani Suwayf, Egypt
关键词
terbutaline sulphate; nebulizer; next generation impactor; evaporation; cooling; flow; CEN method; SIZE DISTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2008.0650
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Characterization of the aerosolized dose emitted from a nebulized system can be determined using CEN (prEN13544-1) methodology and more recently with a Next Generation Impactor (NGI), but evaporative effects can influence the results. We have investigated these characteristics using different flows and cooling with the NGI and compared the results to the standard CEN method using two different nebulizer systems. The NGI was operated using flows of 15 and 30 L min(-1) at room (ROOM) temperature and immediately after cooling at 5 degrees C for 90 min (COLD). Two nebulizer systems, the Sidestream jet nebulizer (SIDE) and the Aeroneb Pro (AERO), were used to nebulize terbutaline sulphate respiratory solution. The CEN method was also used to provide the aerodynamic characteristics of the aerosolized dose from these two nebulizer systems. The mean (SD) mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) using 15COLD, 15ROOM, 30COLD, 30ROOM, and CEN for AERO was 5.0(0.1), 4.1(0.3), 4.4(0.2), 2.0(0.3), and 3.0(1.1) mu m, respectively, and 4.2(0.4), 2.6(0.4), 3.5(0.1), 1.7(0.1), and 3.2(0.3) mu m for SIDE. The fine particle fraction (FPF), using the NGI, followed the expected trend associated with the corresponding MMAD values, ranging from 48.1 to 70.5% from AERO and 57.3 to 87.8% for SIDE. The mean FPF for AERO and SIDE using the CEN methodology was 72.5 and 63.6%. Overall there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between the different operating conditions for the FPF and MMAD of both nebulizer systems. All methods revealed a significant difference between AERO and SIDE except CEN. Both nebulizer systems were prone to evaporation effects during in vitro testing. Cooling and using a slow flow minimizes evaporation effects with the NGI and should be adopted as the recommended compendial method. The CEN method provides different values to those of the NGI operating conditions and could not differentiate between the two nebulizers.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
BERG E, 2007, J AEROSOL MED, V20, P189
[2]
Berg E., 2004, RESP DRUG DELIVERY, V9, P361
[3]
BERG E, 2008, PHARMEUROPA SCI NOTE, V1, P21
[4]
Determination of nebulizer droplet size distribution: A method based on impactor refrigeration [J].
Berg, Elna ;
Svensson, Jan Olof ;
Asking, Lars .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG, 2007, 20 (02) :97-104
[5]
Boe J, 2001, EUR RESPIR J, V18, P228
[6]
*BRIT PHARM, 2005, PREP INH AER ASS FIN, pA277
[7]
FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF AEROSOLS FROM JET NEBULIZERS [J].
CLAY, MM ;
PAVIA, D ;
NEWMAN, SP ;
CLARKE, SW .
THORAX, 1983, 38 (10) :755-759
[8]
CLAY MM, 1983, LANCET, V2, P592
[9]
*COM EUR NORM, 2001, 135441 PREN, P33
[10]
DENNIS J, 2008, PHARMEUROPA SCI NOTE, V1, P27