Beyond mere ownership: transaction demand as a moderator of the endowment effect

被引:31
作者
Mandel, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, Victoria, BC V8W 3P5, Canada
关键词
endowment effect; transaction demand; subjective valuation;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00013-4
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Transaction demand refers to the motivation to complete a transaction. As transaction demand increases, owners should sell at lower prices and buyers should buy at higher ones. It was predicted that the endowment effect-the tendency for minimum selling price to exceed maximum buying price for a particular commodity-should be minimized when buyers and sellers have high transaction demand. The results of two experiments supported this hypothesis: In Experiment 1, the endowment effect was observed when participants imagined another individual wanting to buy from or sell to them, but not when they imagined wanting to buy from or sell to another individual. In Experiment 2, a reversal of the endowment effect was observed when transaction demand was high for both prospective buyers and sellers. The findings highlight the importance of motivational factors in addition to other factors (e.g., loss aversion, reference dependence) in determining behavior. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 747
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BarHillel M, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V70, P17
[2]   ON THE SOCIAL NATURE OF NONSOCIAL PERCEPTION - THE MERE OWNERSHIP EFFECT [J].
BEGGAN, JK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (02) :229-237
[3]  
BEGGAN JK, 1991, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V6, P129
[4]   POSSESSIONS AND THE EXTENDED SELF [J].
BELK, RW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) :139-168
[5]   ADAPTATION LEVEL DETERMINANTS OF SATISFACTION WITH EQUAL AND UNEQUAL OUTCOME DISTRIBUTIONS IN SKILL AND CHANCE SITUATIONS [J].
BRICKMAN, P .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 32 (02) :191-198
[6]  
Chapman GB, 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V11, P47, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199803)11:1<47::AID-BDM278>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-B
[8]  
Ciarrochi J, 2000, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V30, P631
[9]   REASONS FOR FRAMING EFFECTS [J].
FRISCH, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1993, 54 (03) :399-429
[10]  
GREEN DM, 1974, SIGNAL DETECTION THE