Defining the therapeutic role of local anesthetic sympathetic blockade in complex regional pain syndrome: A narrative and systematic review

被引:81
作者
Cepeda, MS
Lau, J
Carr, DB
机构
[1] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] San Ignacio Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Javeriana Univ, Sch Med, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Clin Care Res, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
causalgia; meta-analysis; reflex sympathetic dystrophy;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-200207000-00002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: There is growing controversy oil the Value of blocking the sympathetic nervous system for the treatment of complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS). The authors sought to evaluate the efficacy of sympathetic blockade with local anesthetic in these syndromes. In addition. them performed a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology and other treatments for CRPS. Design: Systematic review of the literature was performed. MEDLINE was searched from 1966 through 1999. The authors identified only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated sympathetic blockade with local anesthetic. but because of differences in study design they were unable to pool the study data. The authors therefore included nonrandomized studies and case series. Interventions: Studies Acre included if local anesthetic sympathetic blockade was used in at least 10 patients. Studies ere excluded if continuous infusion techniques. somatic nerve blocks, or combined sympatholytic therapies were evaluated, Outcome Measures: Pain relief was classified as full, partial, or absent. The lack of a comparison g-roup in the studies allowed only the calculation of distribution of the response categories. and the sum of the pooled rates does not equal 100%. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included that evaluated 1,144 patients. Nineteen studies were retrospective, 5 prospective case series. 3 RCTs. and 2 nonrandomized controlled Studies. The quality of the publications was generally poor. Twenty-nine percent of patients had full response. 41 had partial response. and 32% had absent response. It was not possible to estimate the duration of pain relief. Conclusions: This review raises questions as to the efficacy of local anesthetic sympathetic blockade as treatment of CRPS. Its efficacy is based mainly oil case series Less than one third of patients obtained full pain relief The absence of control groups in case series leads to an overestimation of the treatment response that call explain the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 233
页数:18
相关论文
共 174 条
  • [1] Bisphosphonate therapy of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome
    Adami, S
    Fossaluzza, V
    Gatti, D
    Fracassi, E
    Braga, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1997, 56 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [2] ALLBRITTEN FF, 1946, SURGERY, V19, P407
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1 SCI M EUR FED IASP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1995, Systematic reviews
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1998, Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions
  • [6] Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - A randomized controlled trial
    Backonja, M
    Beydoun, A
    Edwards, KR
    Schwartz, SL
    Fonseca, V
    Hes, M
    LaMoreaux, L
    Garofalo, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21): : 1831 - 1836
  • [7] RESPONSE OF CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN SYNDROMES TO KETAMINE - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY
    BACKONJA, M
    ARNDT, G
    GOMBAR, KA
    CHECK, B
    ZIMMERMANN, M
    [J]. PAIN, 1994, 56 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [8] CAUSALGIA - A REVIEW OF 28 TREATED CASES
    BAKER, AG
    WINEGARNER, FG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1969, 117 (05) : 690 - +
  • [9] POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - METAANALYSES OF INITIAL RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS
    BALLANTYNE, JC
    CARR, DB
    CHALMERS, TC
    DEAR, KBG
    ANGELILLO, IF
    MOSTELLER, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 5 (03) : 182 - 193
  • [10] THE ROLE OF SYMPATHECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF CAUSALGIA
    BARNES, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1953, 35 (02): : 172 - 180