Central blockade of muscarinic cholinergic receptors disrupts affective and attentional set-shifting

被引:77
作者
Chen, KC [1 ]
Baxter, MG [1 ]
Rodefer, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
acetylcholine; attention; executive function; frontal cortex; learning;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03548.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Impairments in multiple aspects of attentional and executive function follow damage to cholinergic neurons in the central nervous system. Affective and attentional set-shifting represent two aspects of executive function controlled by different sectors of the prefrontal cortex. The involvement of cholinergic neural mechanisms in these aspects of executive function has not been specified. To determine whether central muscarinic cholinergic receptors were involved in affective and/or attentional set-shifting, we tested rats on a series of discrimination learning problems, which included affective (reversal learning) and attentional set (extradimensional shift)-shifting components, under the systemic influence of scopolamine, a muscarinic antagonist. Scopolamine impaired both reversal learning and extradimensional shifting, but was without effect on learning new discrimination problems that did not require an affective or attentional shift. Systemic administration of methylscopolamine, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier, did not impair affective or attentional set-shifting, indicating that the scopolamine effects were centrally mediated. These data implicate muscarinic receptors in the central nervous system in the control of executive function. Taken together with other recent data, they may also suggest an important role for cholinergic receptors outside of the neocortex in regulating these aspects of attention and executive function.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1088
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
Aged rats are impaired on an attentional set-shifting task sensitive to medial frontal cortex damage in young rats [J].
Barense, MD ;
Fox, MT ;
Baxter, MG .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2002, 9 (04) :191-201
[2]
Cognitive functions of the basal forebrain [J].
Baxter, MG ;
Chiba, AA .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (02) :178-183
[3]
Baxter MG, 2002, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY MEMO, P425
[4]
Birrell JM, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P4320
[5]
BLACKWELL AD, 2000, 83713 SOC NEUR
[6]
Rodent models of prefrontal cortical function [J].
Brown, VJ ;
Bowman, EM .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2002, 25 (07) :340-343
[7]
Detection of visual signals by rats: effects of chlordiazepoxide and cholinergic and adrenergic drugs on sustained attention [J].
Bushnell, PJ ;
Oshiro, WM ;
Padnos, BK .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 134 (03) :230-241
[8]
Planning impairments in frontal lobe dementia and frontal lobe lesion patients [J].
Carlin, D ;
Bonerba, J ;
Phipps, M ;
Alexander, G ;
Shapiro, M ;
Grafman, J .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2000, 38 (05) :655-665
[9]
Attentional set-shifting in mice:: modification of a rat paradigm, and evidence for strain-dependent variation [J].
Colacicco, G ;
Welzl, H ;
Lipp, HP ;
Würbel, H .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 132 (01) :95-102
[10]
The effect of dopamine depletion from the caudate nucleus of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) on tests of prefrontal cognitive function [J].
Collins, P ;
Wilkinson, LS ;
Everitt, BJ ;
Robbins, TW ;
Roberts, AC .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 114 (01) :3-17