Telehealth Among US Hospitals: Several Factors, Including State Reimbursement And Licensure Policies, Influence Adoption

被引:178
作者
Adler-Milstein, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Kvedar, Joseph [3 ]
Bates, David W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Partners Healthcare Syst, Ctr Connected Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
RURAL HOSPITALS; TELEMEDICINE; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; READINESS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1054
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Telehealth is widely believed to hold great potential to improve access to, and increase the value of, health care. Gaining a better understanding of why some hospitals adopt telehealth technologies while others do not is critically important. We examined factors associated with telehealth adoption among US hospitals. Data from the Information Technology Supplement to the American Hospital Association's 2012 annual survey of acute care hospitals show that 42 percent of US hospitals have telehealth capabilities. Hospitals more likely to have telehealth capabilities are teaching hospitals, those equipped with additional advanced medical technology, those that are members of a larger system, and those that are nonprofit institutions. Rates of hospital telehealth adoption by state vary substantially and are associated with differences in state policy. Policies that promote private payer reimbursement for telehealth are associated with greater likelihood of telehealth adoption, while policies that require out-of-state providers to have a special license to provide telehealth services reduce the likelihood of adoption. Our findings suggest steps that policy makers can take to achieve greater adoption of telehealth by hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 215
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
American Hospital Association, 2012, AHA HEALTHCARE IT DA
[2]  
[Anonymous], TELEHEALTH
[3]   Does Telemonitoring Of Patients-The eICU-Improve Intensive Care? [J].
Berenson, Robert A. ;
Grossman, Joy M. ;
November, Elizabeth A. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (05) :W937-W947
[4]  
Broderick A., 2013, PARTNERS HEALTHCARE
[5]   Effects of type 2 diabetes behavioural telehealth interventions on glycaemic control and adherence: a systematic review [J].
Cassimatis, Mandy ;
Kavanagh, David J. .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2012, 18 (08) :447-450
[6]  
Center for Connected Health Policy, 2013, STATE TELEHEALTH LAW
[7]   Ten Strategies To Lower Costs, Improve Quality, And Engage Patients: The View From Leading Health System CEOs [J].
Cosgrove, Delos M. ;
Fisher, Michael ;
Gabow, Patricia ;
Gottlieb, Gary ;
Halvorson, George C. ;
James, Brent C. ;
Kaplan, Gary S. ;
Perlin, Jonathan B. ;
Petzel, Robert ;
Steele, Glenn D. ;
Toussaint, John S. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (02) :321-327
[8]   How hospitals confront new technology [J].
Coye, MJ ;
Kell, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (01) :163-173
[9]   Remote Patient Management: Technology-Enabled Innovation And Evolving Business Models For Chronic Disease Care [J].
Coye, Molly Joel ;
Haselkorn, Ateret ;
DeMello, Steven .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (01) :126-135
[10]   INNOVATION PROFILE Costs For 'Hospital At Home' Patients Were 19 Percent Lower, With Equal Or Better Outcomes Compared To Similar Inpatients [J].
Cryer, Lesley ;
Shannon, Scott B. ;
Van Amsterdam, Melanie ;
Leff, Bruce .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (06) :1237-1243