Intraperitoneal versus intravenous cisplatin in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in optimally cytoreduced advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A randomized trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Noud-Ovest

被引:99
作者
Gadducci, A [1 ]
Carnino, F
Chiara, S
Brunetti, I
Tanganelli, L
Romanini, A
Bruzzone, M
Conte, PF
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Reprod Med, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Pisa, Italy
[2] S Anna Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Turin, Italy
[3] Natl Inst Canc Res, Div Med Oncol, Genoa, Italy
[4] S Chiara Hosp, Div Med Oncol, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1999.5677
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has a strong biological and pharmacological rationale in the treatment of ovarian cancer. From 1989 to 1996 the present study included 113 patients with FIGO stage II-IV ovarian cancer with residual disease less than 2 cm who were randomly allocated to receive 50 mg/m(2) intraperitoneal cisplatin (CDDP) plus 60 mg/m(2) intravenous epidoxorubicin (EPIDOX) and 600 mg/m(2) intravenous cyclophosphamide (CTX) (ipPEC arm) or 50 mg/m(2) intravenous CDDP plus 60 mg/m(2) intravenous EPIDOX and 600 mg/m(2) intravenous CTX (ivPEC arm). Chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks for six cycles. Treatment protocol was changed in 22 patients, 2 from the iv arm (who received single-agent carboplatin) and 20 from the ip arm (who were crossed to systemic chemotherapy, ivPEC, or single-agent carboplatin). At the end of chemotherapy, a second-look was performed in 33 of the 54 patients from the ip arm and in 34 of the 57 patients from the systemic arm. The pathologic complete response rate was 41% of all entered patients and 69% of patients submitted to second-look. No significant difference in pathologic response rate as well as in hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was seen between the two arms. Up to September 1998, 72 patients showed a disease recurrence (33 treated with ipPEC and 39 treated with ivPEC), 55 died (22 ipPEC and 30 ivPEC), and 10 were lost to follow-up (6 ipPEC and 4 ivPEC). Median progression-free survival was 42 and 25 months for ipPEC and ivPEC, respectively (p = 0.13). Median overall survival was 67 and 51 months for ipPEC and ivPEC, respectively (p = 0.14). In conclusion, besides confirming that intraperitoneal chemotherapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity but with poor compliance in community hospitals, this trial showed that intraperitoneal CDDP compared with intravenous CDDP in combination with EPIDOX and CTX obtained a slight (not significant) improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival of optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer patients. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 162
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer
    Alberts, DS
    Liu, PY
    Hannigan, EV
    OToole, R
    Williams, SD
    Young, JA
    Franklin, EW
    ClarkePearson, DL
    Malviya, VK
    DuBeshter, B
    Adelson, MD
    Hoskins, WJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) : 1950 - 1955
  • [2] Intraperitoneal carboplatin with or without interferon-alpha in advanced ovarian cancer patients with minimal residual disease at second look: A prospective randomized trial of 111 patients
    Bruzzone, M
    Rubagotti, A
    Gadducci, A
    Catsafados, E
    Foglia, G
    Brunetti, I
    Giannessi, PG
    Carnino, F
    Iskra, L
    Rosso, R
    Martoni, A
    Pannuti, F
    DeLisi, V
    Maltoni, R
    Ridolfi, R
    Mammoliti, S
    Gallo, L
    Boccardo, F
    Ragni, N
    Conte, PF
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) : 499 - 505
  • [3] COLOMBO N, 1993, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V12, P255
  • [4] High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in suboptimal ovarian cancer: A randomized study of the gruppo oncologico nord-ovest
    Conte, PF
    Bruzzone, M
    Carnino, F
    Gadducci, A
    Algeri, R
    Bellini, A
    Boccardo, F
    Brunetti, I
    Catsafados, E
    Chiara, S
    Foglia, G
    Gallo, I
    Iskra, L
    Mammoliti, S
    Parodi, G
    Ragni, N
    Rosso, R
    Rugiati, S
    Rubagotti, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) : 351 - 356
  • [5] DEDRICK RL, 1985, SEMIN ONCOL, V12, P1
  • [6] PHASE-I FEASIBILITY AND PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDY OF WEEKLY INTRAPERITONEAL PACLITAXEL - A GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP PILOT-STUDY
    FRANCIS, P
    ROWINSKY, E
    SCHNEIDER, J
    HAKES, T
    HOSKINS, W
    MARKMAN, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (12) : 2961 - 2967
  • [7] LONG-TERM SURVIVAL OF ADVANCED REFRACTORY OVARIAN-CARCINOMA PATIENTS WITH SMALL-VOLUME DISEASE TREATED WITH INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY
    HOWELL, SB
    ZIMM, S
    MARKMAN, M
    ABRAMSON, IS
    CLEARY, S
    LUCAS, WE
    WEISS, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (10) : 1607 - 1612
  • [8] Mature results of a randomized trial of two doses of cisplatin for the treatment of ovarian cancer
    Kaye, SB
    Paul, J
    Cassidy, J
    Lewis, CR
    Duncan, ID
    Gordon, HK
    Kitchener, HC
    Cruickshank, DJ
    Atkinson, RJ
    Soukop, M
    Rankin, EM
    Davis, JA
    Reed, NS
    Crawford, SM
    MacLean, A
    Parkin, D
    Sarkar, TK
    Kennedy, J
    Symonds, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (07) : 2113 - 2119
  • [9] A PHASE-II TRIAL OF INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE AS SALVAGE TREATMENT FOR MINIMAL RESIDUAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    KIRMANI, S
    LUCAS, WE
    KIM, S
    GOEL, R
    MCVEY, L
    MORRIS, J
    HOWELL, SB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (04) : 649 - 657
  • [10] DOSE INTENSITY ANALYSIS OF CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    LEVIN, L
    HRYNIUK, WM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (05) : 756 - 767