Trade policy under the GATT/WTO: empirical evidence of the equal treatment rule

被引:14
作者
Bown, CP [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Dept Econ, Waltham, MA 02254 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 2004年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00243.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A fundamental difference between multilateral trade agreements like the GATT and WTO and a preferential agreement is the multilateral agreements' inclusion of a most-favoured-nation principle. Though MFN requires that members implement policies that provide equal treatment to all GATT/WTO countries, how far do members actually follow the MFN principle when so required? We empirically investigate a sample of GATT/WTO trade disputes and the effect of successful, dispute settlement negotiations on the disputed product trade of third country exporters to the defendant country. We document evidence of trade liberalization consistent with defendant countries successfully applying the equal treatment rule.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 720
页数:43
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AGR AGR FOOD CAN, 1997, BIW B, V10
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT FIN STAT
[3]   An economic theory of GATT [J].
Bagwell, K ;
Staiger, RW .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (01) :215-248
[4]   Multilateral trade negotiations, bilateral opportunism and the rules of GATT/WTO [J].
Bagwell, K ;
Staiger, RW .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 63 (01) :1-29
[5]   The WTO as a mechanism for securing market access property rights: Implications for global labor and environmental issues [J].
Bagwell, K ;
Staiger, RW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (03) :69-88
[6]  
BALTAGI B.H, 1998, ECONOMETRICS
[7]   Trade disputes and the implementation of protection under the GATT: an empirical assessment [J].
Bown, CP .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 62 (02) :263-294
[8]  
BOWN CP, 2002, ECON POLIT-OXFORD, V14, P283, DOI DOI 10.1111/1468-0343.00109
[9]  
BOWN CP, 2004, REV EC STAT, V86
[10]  
BOWN CP, 2003, PARTICIPATION WTO DI