Predicting success: Patterns of cortical activation and deactivation prior to response inhibition

被引:105
作者
Hester, RL
Murphy, K
Foxe, JJ
Foxe, DM
Javitt, DC
Garavan, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Psychol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Nathan S Kline Inst Psychiat Res, Orangeburg, NY 10962 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/089892904970726
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study investigated the relationships between attention and other preparatory processes prior to a response inhibition task and the processes involved in the inhibition itself. To achieve this, a mixed fMRI design was employed to identify the functional areas activated during both inhibition decision events and the block of trials following a visual cue introduced 2 to 7 sec prior (cue period). Preparing for successful performance produced increases in activation for both the cue period and the inhibition itself in the frontoparietal cortical network. Furthermore, preparation produced activation decreases in midline areas (insula and medial prefrontal) argued to be responsible for monitoring internal emotional states, and these cue period deactivations alone predicted subsequent success or failure. The results suggest that when cues are provided to signify the imminent requirement for behavioral control, successful performance results from a coordinated pattern of preparatory activation in task-relevant areas and deactivation of task-irrelevant ones.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / 785
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[2]   The covert orienting of visual attention following severe traumatic brain injury [J].
Bate, AJ ;
Mathias, JL ;
Crawford, JR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 23 (03) :386-398
[3]   Performance on the test of everyday attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury [J].
Bate, AJ ;
Mathias, JL ;
Crawford, JR .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 15 (03) :405-422
[4]   The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation [J].
Brass, M ;
von Cramon, DY .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2002, 12 (09) :908-914
[5]   Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Bush, G ;
Luu, P ;
Posner, MI .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (06) :215-222
[6]   Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the counting stroop [J].
Bush, G ;
Frazier, JA ;
Rauch, SL ;
Seidman, LJ ;
Whalen, PJ ;
Jenike, MA ;
Rosen, BR ;
Biederman, J .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (12) :1542-1552
[7]   Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies [J].
Cabeza, R ;
Nyberg, L .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (01) :1-47
[8]   A further study on the sustained attention response to task (SART): the effect of age, gender and education [J].
Chan, RCK .
BRAIN INJURY, 2001, 15 (09) :819-829
[9]   Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods [J].
Cohen, MS .
NEUROIMAGE, 1997, 6 (02) :93-103
[10]   AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages [J].
Cox, RW .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (03) :162-173