Three-in-one blocks with ropivacaine:: Evaluation of sensory onset time and quality of sensory block

被引:65
作者
Marhofer, P [1 ]
Oismüller, C [1 ]
Faryniak, B [1 ]
Sitzwohl, C [1 ]
Mayer, N [1 ]
Kapral, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Anesthesiol & Gen Intens Care Med, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200001000-00028
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to evaluate the sensory onset time and the quality of sensory block of ropivacaine, a new long-acting local anesthetic, compared with bupivacaine, for 3-in-1 blocks. Fifty ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing hip surgery after trauma were randomly assigned to two study groups of 25 patients each. The two study groups received a 3-in-1 block with either 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% or 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5%. Blocks in both groups were performed using a nerve stimulator. The sensory onset time and the quality of sensory block was assessed by pinprick test in the central sensory region of each of the three nerves and compared with the same stimulation in the contralateral leg. We used a scale from 100% (normal sensation) to 0% (no sensory sensation). We did not find significant differences in sensory onset times between the ropivacaine group and the bupivacaine group (30 +/- 11 vs 32 +/- 10 min). The quality of sensory blocks was also comparable between the study groups (19% +/- 20% vs 21% +/- 15%). We conclude that the sensory onset time and quality of sensory block during 3-in-1 blocks performed with ropivacaine are comparable to those with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine is described as being less potent than bupivacaine, making this local anesthetic promising for 3-in-1 blocks because of its reportedly lower incidence of cardiovascular and central nervous system complications. Implications: Ropivacaine 0.5% has a sensory onset time and quality of sensory block during 3-in-1 blocks similar to that of bupivacaine 0.5%. Ropivacaine is described as being less potent than bupivacaine, making it a promising local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks because of its reportedly lower cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 128
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
ARTHUR GR, 1988, ANESTH ANALG, V67, P1053
[2]
ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF OBTURATOR NERVE BLOCK TO 3-IN-ONE BLOCK [J].
ATANASSOFF, PG ;
WEISS, BM ;
BRULL, SJ ;
HORST, A ;
KULLING, D ;
STEIN, R ;
THEILER, I .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (03) :529-533
[3]
Comparison of the three-in-one and fascia iliaca compartment blocks in adults: Clinical and radiographic analysis [J].
Capdevila, X ;
Biboulet, P ;
Bouregba, M ;
Barthelet, Y ;
Rubenovitch, J ;
d'Athis, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (05) :1039-1044
[4]
DENNIG L, 1987, Regional-Anaesthesie, V10, P114
[5]
The duration of action of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and pethidine in peripheral nerve block in the rat [J].
Dyhre, H ;
Lang, M ;
Wallin, R ;
Renck, H .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 41 (10) :1346-1352
[6]
A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine during sciatic and femoral nerve blockade [J].
Fanelli, G ;
Casati, A ;
Beccaria, P ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Berti, M ;
Tarantino, F ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (03) :597-600
[7]
Fattorini F, 1997, Clin Ter, V148, P527
[8]
HICKEY R, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V75, P602
[9]
PRILOCAINE IN LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS BLOCK GENERAL EFFICACY AND COMPARISON OF NERVE-STIMULATION AMPLITUDE [J].
KAISER, H ;
NIESEL, HC ;
KLIMPEL, L ;
BODENMUELLER, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 36 (07) :692-697
[10]
Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers [J].
Knudsen, K ;
Suurkula, MB ;
Blomberg, S ;
Sjovall, J ;
Edvardsson, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :507-514