Are insect pollinators more generalist than insect herbivores?

被引:69
作者
Fontaine, Colin [1 ]
Thebault, Elisa [1 ]
Dajoz, Isabelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Biol, NERC Ctr Populat Biol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[2] Univ Paris 07, UMR 7618, F-75230 Paris 05, France
关键词
generalism; herbivory; interaction web; mutualistic; pollination; trophic; ANIMAL MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS; HOST-SPECIFICITY; ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES; DIFFUSE COEVOLUTION; SPECIALIZATION; EVOLUTION; WEB; CONSEQUENCES; COMPETITION; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2009.0635
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recent community-level studies have acknowledged that generalist species are more widespread than previously thought and highlighted their preponderant impact on community functioning and evolution. It is suggested that the type of interaction, trophic versus mutualistic, should affect species generalization level; however, no direct comparison has been made yet. Here, we performed such a comparison using 44 plant-insect networks describing either pollination or herbivory communities. Our analysis shows that the type of interaction does indeed have an impact on various aspects of species generalism, from the distribution of generalism in the community to the phylogenetic diversity of the plants with which a given insect species interacts. However, the amplitude of the observed differences depends on the aspect of species generalism studied. While the non-quantitative and quantitative measures of generalism suggest that pollinators interact with more plant species and more evenly than herbivores, phylogenetic measures clearly show that herbivores interact with plant species far more closely related to each other than pollinators. This comparative approach offers a promising perspective to better understand the functioning and evolution of multispecies assemblages by pointing out some fundamental singularities of communities depending on the type of interaction considered.
引用
收藏
页码:3027 / 3033
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GEOGRAPHIC MOSAIC CO
[2]   COMMUNITY STUDIES IN POLLINATION ECOLOGY IN THE HIGH TEMPERATE ANDES OF CENTRAL CHILE .1. POLLINATION MECHANISMS AND ALTITUDINAL VARIATION [J].
ARROYO, MTK ;
PRIMACK, R ;
ARMESTO, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1982, 69 (01) :82-97
[3]   The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Melián, CJ ;
Olesen, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (16) :9383-9387
[4]   ON THE EVOLUTION OF HOST SPECIFICITY IN PHYTOPHAGOUS ARTHROPODS [J].
BERNAYS, E ;
GRAHAM, M .
ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (04) :886-892
[5]   Quantitative descriptors of food-web matrices [J].
Bersier, LF ;
Banasek-Richter, C ;
Cattin, MF .
ECOLOGY, 2002, 83 (09) :2394-2407
[6]   Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Bolnick, DI .
NATURE, 2001, 410 (6827) :463-466
[7]   Herbivore responses to plant secondary compounds: A test of phytochemical coevolution theory [J].
Cornell, HV ;
Hawkins, BA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 161 (04) :507-522
[8]   SEQUESTRATION OF PLANT NATURAL-PRODUCTS BY INSECTS [J].
DUFFEY, SS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1980, 25 :447-477
[9]  
EHRLICH PR, 1964, EVOLUTION, V18, P586, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x
[10]  
ERWIN T L, 1982, Coleopterists Bulletin, V36, P74