Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance

被引:50
作者
Aron, DC
Gordon, HS
DiGiuseppe, DL
Harper, DL
Rosenthal, GE
机构
[1] Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Med Ctr, Educ Off 14 W, Dept Med, Inst Hlth Care Res, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Med Ctr, Div Clin & Mol Endocrinol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Houston Ctr Qual Care & Utilizat Studies, Houston VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Cleveland VA Med Ctr, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[7] Cleveland VA Med Ctr, Inst Hlth Care Res, Cleveland, OH USA
[8] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Qual Informat Management Program, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; insurance; race;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-200001000-00005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE. To assess the association between race and insurance and Cesarean delivery rates after adjusting for clinical risk factors that increase the likelihood of cesarean delivery. DESIGN. Retrospective cohort study in 21 hospitals in northeast Ohio. SUBJECTS. 25,697 women without prior cesarean deliveries admitted for labor and delivery January 1993 through June 1995. METHODS. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from patients' medical records. The risk of cesarean delivery was adjusted for 39 maternal and neonatal risk factors that were included in a previously developed risk-adjustment model using nested logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Odds ratios for cesarean delivery in nonwhite patients relative to whites and for patients with government insurance or who were uninsured relative to patients with commercial insurance. RESULTS. The overall rate of cesarean delivery was similar in white and nonwhite patients (15.8% and 16.1%, respectively), but rates varied (P < 0.001) according to insurance (17.0%, 14.2%, 10.7% in patients with commercial insurance, government insurance, and without insurance, respectively). However, after adjusting for clinical factors, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of cesarean delivery was higher in nonwhite patients (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.57; P < 0.001), but similar for patients with government insurance (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90-1.14; P = 0.84) and lower for uninsured patients (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41, 1.03; P = 0.067), albeit not statistically significant. In analyses stratified according to quintiles of predicted risk of cesarean delivery, racial differences were largely limited to patients in the lower risk quintiles. However, differences in odds ratios for uninsured patients were seen across the risk quintiles, although odds ratios were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION. After adjusting for clinical factors, race and insurance status may independently influence the use of cesarean delivery. The higher rates in nonwhites and lower rates in the uninsured may reflect differences in patient preferences or expectations, differences in physician practice, or unmeasured risk factors. The lower adds of cesarean delivery in uninsured women, particularly women at high risk, may raise the issue of underutilization of services and warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance [J].
Aron, DC ;
Harper, DL ;
Shepardson, LB ;
Rosenthal, GE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (24) :1968-1972
[2]   Racial variation in the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical System [J].
Arozullah, AM ;
Ferreira, MR ;
Bennett, RL ;
Gilman, S ;
Henderson, WG ;
Daley, J ;
Khuri, S ;
Bennett, CL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 188 (06) :604-622
[3]  
BAILEY EJ, 1987, J NATL MED ASSOC, V79, P389
[4]   ACCESS TO MEDICAL-CARE FOR BLACK AND WHITE AMERICANS - A MATTER OF CONTINUING CONCERN [J].
BLENDON, RJ ;
AIKEN, LH ;
FREEMAN, HE ;
COREY, CR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (02) :278-281
[5]   RACIAL ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE LIKELIHOOD OF CESAREAN DELIVERY, CALIFORNIA [J].
BRAVEMAN, P ;
EGERTER, S ;
EDMONSTON, F ;
VERDON, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (05) :625-630
[6]  
BROOKS TR, 1992, J NATL MED ASSOC, V84, P941
[7]   SOME SOURCES OF ERROR IN THE CODING OF BIRTH-WEIGHT [J].
BRUNSKILL, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (01) :72-73
[8]   THE QUALITY OF THE NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATA - A VALIDATION-STUDY IN NORTH-CAROLINA [J].
BUESCHER, PA ;
TAYLOR, KP ;
DAVIS, MH ;
BOWLING, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (08) :1163-1165
[9]   THE EFFECT OF PHYSICIAN FACTORS ON THE CESAREAN-SECTION DECISION [J].
BURNS, LR ;
GELLER, SE ;
WHOLEY, DR .
MEDICAL CARE, 1995, 33 (04) :365-382
[10]   Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of cardiovascular procedures: Associations with type of health insurance [J].
Carlisle, DM ;
Leake, BD ;
Shapiro, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (02) :263-267