The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows

被引:113
作者
Acreman, M. C. [1 ]
Overton, I. C. [2 ]
King, J. [3 ]
Wood, P. J. [4 ]
Cowx, I. G. [5 ]
Dunbar, M. J. [1 ]
Kendy, E. [6 ]
Young, W. J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[2] CSIRO, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
[3] Univ Western Cape, Inst Water Studies, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ Loughborough, Dept Geog, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[5] Univ Hull, Hull Int Fisheries Inst, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[6] Nature Conservancy, North Amer Reg, Helena, MT 59601 USA
[7] CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2014年 / 59卷 / 3-4期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
environmental flows; ecohydrology; hydroecology; MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY RESPONSE; HYDROLOGIC ALTERATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; REQUIREMENTS; FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION; ASSESSMENTS; ADAPTATION; DISCHARGE; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2014.886019
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The term "environmental flows" is now widely used to reflect the hydrological regime required to sustain freshwater and estuarine ecosystems, and the human livelihoods and well-being that depend on them. The definition suggests a central role for ecohydrological science to help determine a required flow regime for a target ecosystem condition. Indeed, many countries have established laws and policies to implement environmental flows with the expectation that science can deliver the answers. This article provides an overview of recent developments and applications of environmental flows on six continents to explore the changing role of ecohydrological sciences, recognizing its limitations and the emerging needs of society, water resource managers and policy makers. Science has responded with new methods to link hydrology to ecosystem status, but these have also raised fundamental questions that go beyond ecohydrology, such as who decides on the target condition of the ecosystem? Some environmental flow methods are based on the natural flow paradigm, which assumes the desired regime is the natural "unmodified" condition. However, this may be unrealistic where flow regimes have been altered for many centuries and are likely to change with future climate change. Ecosystems are dynamic, so the adoption of environmental flows needs to have a similar dynamic basis. Furthermore, methodological developments have been made in two directions: first, broad-scale hydrological analysis of flow regimes (assuming ecological relevance of hydrograph components) and, second, analysis of ecological impacts of more than one stressor (e.g. flow, morphology, water quality). All methods retain a degree of uncertainty, which translates into risks, and raises questions regarding trust between scientists and the public. Communication between scientists, social scientists, practitioners, policy makers and the public is thus becoming as important as the quality of the science.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 450
页数:18
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] *ABC, 2012, LAT
  • [2] Defining environmental river flow requirements - a review
    Acreman, M
    Dunbar, MJ
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (05) : 861 - 876
  • [3] Linking science and decision-making: features and experience from environmental river flow setting
    Acreman, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (02) : 99 - 109
  • [4] Environmental flows from dams: the water framework directive
    Acreman, M.
    Aldrick, J.
    Binnie, C.
    Black, A.
    Cowx, I.
    Dawson, H.
    Dunbar, M.
    Extence, C.
    Hannaford, J.
    Harby, A.
    Holmes, N.
    Jarritt, N.
    Old, G.
    Peirson, G.
    Webb, J.
    Wood, P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, 162 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [5] Acreman M., 2001, WATER POLICY, V3, P257, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1366-7017(01)00009-5
  • [6] Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive
    Acreman, M. C.
    Ferguson, A. J. D.
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) : 32 - 48
  • [7] Acreman M.C., 2006, P INT C RIV BAS MAN
  • [8] Acreman MC, 1996, J CHART INST WATER E, V10, P429
  • [9] ACREMAN MC, 2001, HYDROECOLOGY LINKING, P266
  • [10] ACREMAN MC, 2000, P INT WORKSH DEV MAN