Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

被引:281
作者
Chen, AM
Meric-Bernstam, F
Hunt, KK
Thames, HD
Oswald, MJ
Outlaw, ED
Strom, EA
McNeese, MD
Kuerer, HM
Ross, MI
Singletary, SE
Ames, FC
Feig, BW
Sahin, AA
Perkins, GH
Schechter, NR
Hortobagyi, GN
Buchholz, TA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biomath, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.09.062
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine patterns of local-regional recurrence (LRR) and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) among patients treated with breast conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Between 1987 and 2000, 340 cases of breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Clinical stage at diagnosis (according to the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer system) was I in 4%, 11 in 58%, and III in 38% of patients. Only 4% had positive surgical margins. Results At a median follow-up period of 60 months (range, 10 to 180 months), 29 patients had developed LRR, 16 of which were IBTRs. Five-year actuarial rates of IBTR-free and LRR-free survival were 95% and 91%, respectively. Variables that positively correlated with IBTR and LRR were clinical N2 or N3 disease, pathologic residual tumor larger than 2 cm, a multifocal pattern of residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion in the specimen. The presence of any one of these factors was associated with 5-year actuarial IBTR-free and LRR-free survival rates of 87% to 91% and 77% to 84%, respectively. Initial T category (T1-2 v T3-4) correlated with LRR but did not correlate with I BTR (5-year I BTR-free rates of 96% v 92%, respectively, P = .19). Conclusion Breast conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in acceptably low rates of LRR and IBTR in appropriately selected patients, even those with T3 or T4 disease. Advanced nodal involvement at diagnosis, residual tumor larger than 2 cm, multifocal residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion predict higher rates of LRR and IBTR. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2303 / 2312
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN 126 OPERABLE BREAST CANCERS [J].
BELEMBAOGO, E ;
FEILLEL, V ;
CHOLLET, P ;
CURE, H ;
VERRELLE, P ;
KWIATKOWSKI, F ;
ACHARD, JL ;
LEBOUEDEC, G ;
CHASSAGNE, J ;
BIGNON, YJ ;
DELATOUR, M ;
LAFAYE, C ;
DAUPLAT, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (4-5) :896-900
[2]   Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: Eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute [J].
Bonadonna, G ;
Valagussa, P ;
Brambilla, C ;
Ferrari, L ;
Moliterni, A ;
Terenziani, M ;
Zambetti, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (01) :93-100
[3]   Short and long-term effects on survival in breast cancer patients treated by primary chemotherapy:: an updated analysis of a randomized trial [J].
Broët, P ;
Scholl, SM ;
de la Rochefordière, A ;
Fourquet, A ;
Moreau, T ;
De Rycke, Y ;
Asselain, B ;
Pouillart, P .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1999, 58 (02) :151-156
[4]   Predictors of local-regional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy without radiation [J].
Buchholz, TA ;
Tucker, SL ;
Masullo, L ;
Kuerer, HM ;
Erwin, J ;
Salas, J ;
Frye, D ;
Strom, EA ;
McNeese, MD ;
Perkins, G ;
Katz, A ;
Singletary, SE ;
Hunt, KK ;
Buzdar, AU ;
Hortobagyi, GN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :17-23
[5]   Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer [J].
Buzdar, AU ;
Singletary, SE ;
Theriault, RL ;
Booser, DJ ;
Valero, V ;
Ibrahim, N ;
Smith, TL ;
Asmar, L ;
Frye, D ;
Manuel, N ;
Kau, SW ;
McNeese, M ;
Strom, E ;
Hunt, K ;
Ames, F ;
Hortobagyi, GN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) :3412-3417
[6]  
CALAIS G, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1283, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940815)74:4<1283::AID-CNCR2820740417>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-S
[8]   Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma - Effective clinical downstaging allows breast preservation and predicts outstanding local control and survival [J].
Cance, WG ;
Carey, LA ;
Calvo, BF ;
Sartor, C ;
Sawyer, L ;
Moore, DT ;
Rosenman, J ;
Ollila, DW ;
Graham, M .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) :295-303
[9]  
Cox DR., 1988, ANAL SURVIVAL DATA
[10]   The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to postoperative therapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer [J].
Cunningham, JD ;
Weiss, SE ;
Ahmed, S ;
Bratton, JM ;
Bleiweiss, IJ ;
Tartter, PI ;
Brower, ST .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1998, 16 (02) :80-86