ABT492 and levofloxacin:: comparison of their pharmacodynamics and their abilities to prevent the selection of resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model

被引:38
作者
Firsov, AA
Vostrov, SN
Lubenko, IY
Arzamastsev, AP
Portnoy, YA
Zinner, SH
机构
[1] Russian Acad Med Sci, Gause Inst New Antibiot, Dept Pharmacokinet & Pharmacodynam, Moscow 119021, Russia
[2] Russian Acad Med Sci, Inst Normal Physiol, Moscow, Russia
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Mt Auburn Hosp, Dept Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
S; aureus; resistance; in vitro models;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkh242
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the kinetics of killing/regrowth of differentially susceptible clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus exposed to ABT492 and levofloxacin and to explore their relative abilities to prevent the selection of resistant mutants. Methods: Three clinical isolates of S. aureus-including two ciprofloxacin-susceptible S. aureus, 201 and 480-and a ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus 866, were exposed to clinically achievable ratios of area under the curve (AUC) to MIC in a dynamic model that simulated human pharmacokinetics of ABT492 (400 mg) and levofloxacin (500 mg) as a single dose. In addition, S. aureus 201 was exposed to single and multiple doses of ABT492 and levofloxacin (both once daily for 3 days) over wide ranges of 24 h AUC/MIC (AUC(24)/MIC) including clinically achievable AUC(24)/MIC ratios. Results: With each isolate, ABT492 at clinically achievable AUC/MICs produced greater anti-staphylococcal effects than levofloxacin. Areas between the control growth and the time-kill curves (ABBC in single dose simulations and the sum of ABBCs determined after the first, second and third dosing in multiple dose simulations-ABBC(1+2+3)) were higher with ABT492 than levofloxacin. Moreover, at comparable AUC/MICs and AUC(24)/MICs, the maximal reductions in the starting inoculum of ABT492-exposed S. aureus were more pronounced than with levofloxacin. Loss in susceptibility of S. aureus 201 exposed to ABT492 or levofloxacin depended on the simulated AUC(24)/MIC. Although the maximal increase in MIC (MICfinal) related to its initial value (MICinitial) was seen at a higher AUC(24)/MIC ratio of ABT492 (120 h) than levofloxacin (50 h), similar AUC(24)/MICs (240 and 200 h, respectively) were protective against the selection of resistant S. aureus. These threshold values are readily achievable with 400 mg ABT492 (AUC(24)/MIC 870 h) but not with 500 mg levofloxacin (AUC(24)/MIC 70 h). Conclusion: Overall, these findings predict greater efficacy of clinically achievable AUC/MIC (or AUC(24)/MIC) of ABT492 both in terms of the anti-staphylococcal effect and prevention of the selection of resistant mutants.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*ABB LAB, 2001, ABT492 ABB LAB
[2]   Determination of in vitro susceptibility to ABT-492 by BSAC standardized methodology [J].
Andrews, JM ;
Ashby, JP ;
Jevons, G ;
Wise, R .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 52 (03) :526-527
[3]  
ANDREWS JM, 2003, 43 INT C ANT AG CHEM, P199
[4]   Pharmacokinetics and safety of oral levofloxacin in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals receiving concomitant zidovudine [J].
Chien, SC ;
Chow, AT ;
Rogge, MC ;
Williams, RR ;
Hendrix, CW .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (08) :1765-1769
[5]   Absence of age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics of a single 500-milligram oral dose of levofloxacin in healthy subjects [J].
Chien, SC ;
Chow, AT ;
Natarajan, J ;
Williams, RR ;
Wong, FA ;
Rogge, MC ;
Nayak, RK .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (07) :1562-1565
[6]   Pharmacokinetic profile of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral or intravenous doses [J].
Chien, SC ;
Rogge, MC ;
Gisclon, LG ;
Curtin, C ;
Wong, F ;
Natarajan, J ;
Williams, RR ;
Fowler, CL ;
Cheung, WK ;
Chow, AT .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (10) :2256-2260
[7]   Evaluation of survival and pharmacodynamic relationships for five fluoroquinolones in a neutropenic murine model of pneumococcal lung infection [J].
Ernst, EJ ;
Klepser, ME ;
Petzold, CR ;
Doern, GV .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (04) :463-470
[8]   Comparative pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro dynamic model:: prediction of the equivalent AUC/MIC breakpoints and equiefficient doses [J].
Firsov, AA ;
Lubenko, IY ;
Vostrov, SN ;
Kononenko, OV ;
Zinner, SH ;
Portnoy, YA .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 46 (05) :725-732
[9]   Predictors of effect of ampicillin-sulbactam against TEM-1 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model: Enzyme activity versus MIC [J].
Firsov, AA ;
Savarino, D ;
Ruble, M ;
Gilbert, D ;
Manzano, B ;
Medeiros, AA ;
Zinner, SH .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (03) :734-738
[10]   AUC/MIC relationships to different endpoints of the antimicrobial effect:: multiple-dose in vitro simulations with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin [J].
Firsov, AA ;
Zinner, SH ;
Vostrov, SN ;
Portnoy, YA ;
Lubenko, IY .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (04) :533-539