Instrumental assessment of atopic eczema: Validation of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, erythema, scaling, and edema

被引:59
作者
Holm, Elisabeth A.
Wulf, Hans C.
Thomassen, Lars
Jemec, Gregor B. E.
机构
[1] Roskilde Hosp, Dept Dermatol, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Bispebjerg Hosp, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Hosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] LEO Pharm, Dept Biostat, Ballerup, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2006.03.036
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Quantification of skin diseases can be carried out in many ways. Clinical scores are widely used in atopic eczema (AE), and noninvasive instruments are a relevant supplement. Objective. Our purpose was to validate 5 noninvasive instruments in quantification of AE severity. Methods: In all, 101 patients with AE and 30 control subjects were assessed twice in a clinical cross-sectional examination. Assessment of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, erythema, scaling, and subepidermal edema was assessed on 3 predetermined skin sites. Results: The methods discriminated among various severity degrees and correlated significantly with objective assessment of disease severity. High correlations were found among instruments assessing acute symptoms of AE. Threshold values for transepidermal water loss and capacitance were found. Limitations: No gold standard exists for severity assessment of atopic eczema. Therefore, the methods used cannot be validated in relation to such a standard. Furthermore, atopic eczema is a generalized disease and the methods used assess target lesions. By assessing target lesions, information about the disease is reduced. Conclusion: Noninvasive instruments are valuable in quantification of disease severity in a mixed group of patients with active AE. Assessment with ultrasound has contributed new information about the pathophysiology in AE.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 780
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   IMPROVEMENT OF SKIN BARRIER FUNCTION DURING TREATMENT OF ATOPIC-DERMATITIS [J].
AALTOKORTE, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (06) :969-972
[2]  
ABE T, 1978, Journal of Dermatology (Tokyo), V5, P223
[3]  
AGNER T, 1991, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V71, P296
[4]  
AGNER T, 1992, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, P1
[5]  
Barel A O, 1997, Skin Res Technol, V3, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0846.1997.tb00171.x
[6]  
Berardesca E, 1997, Skin Res Technol, V3, P126, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0846.1997.tb00174.x
[7]   CALCULATING CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS WITH REPEATED OBSERVATIONS .2. CORRELATION BETWEEN SUBJECTS [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6980) :633-633
[8]  
Charman CR, 1999, BRIT J DERMATOL, V140, P109
[9]   Skin color measurements:: comparison between three instruments:: the Chromameter®, the DermaSpectrometer® and the Mexameter® [J].
Clarys, P ;
Alewaeters, K ;
Lambrecht, R ;
Barel, AO .
SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 6 (04) :230-238
[10]  
Der G., 2001, A handbook of statistical analyses using SAS