Abscisic acid concentration, root pH and anatomy do not explain growth differences of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) on acid and alkaline soils

被引:67
作者
Hartung, W
Leport, L
Ratcliffe, RG
Sauter, A
Duda, R
Turner, NC
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Legume Mediterranean Agr, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Julius von Sachs Inst Biowissensch, Lehrstuhl Bot 1, D-97082 Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Univ Rennes 1, UMR 6026, F-35042 Rennes, France
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford OX1 3RB, England
[5] CSIRO Plant Ind, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia
[6] Inst Plant Nutr, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
apoplastic barriers; duplex soils; pH regulation; root morphology;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015831610452
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The ABA concentrations of leaves, roots, soils and transport fluids of chickpea and lupin plants growing in acid (pH=4.8) and alkaline (pH=8.0) soils and an acid soil with an alkaline subsoil and an alkaline soil with an acid subsoil were measured with the aim of explaining the poor growth of narrow-leafed lupins in alkaline soil. The ABA concentration in the leaves was higher in lupin than chickpea, but did not differ when the plants were grown in alkaline compared to acid soil. The ABA concentration of the roots and xylem sap of lupin did not differ significantly when grown in acid or alkaline soil. Chickpea roots and xylem sap had, however, lower ABA concentrations in acid soil. The ABA concentration in the soil solution was higher in the acid than in the alkaline soil. Roots of lupin and chickpea showed no suberization of the hypodermis or exodermis whether grown aeroponically or hydroponically and the pH of the cytoplasm did not change significantly when root cells of lupin and chickpea were exposed to external pHs of 4.8 or 8.0. The chickpea roots had greater suberization of the endodermal cells adjacent to radial xylem rays and maintained a slightly higher vacuolar pH than lupin in both acid and alkaline external media, but these small differences are insufficient to explain the reductions in lupin growth in alkaline soil.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   FACTORS WHICH AFFECT THE GROWTH OF GRAIN LEGUMES ON A SOLONIZED BROWN SOIL .2. GENOTYPIC RESPONSES TO SOIL CHEMICAL FACTORS [J].
ATWELL, BJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1991, 42 (01) :107-119
[2]   A BERBERINE-ANILINE BLUE FLUORESCENT STAINING PROCEDURE FOR SUBERIN, LIGNIN, AND CALLOSE IN PLANT-TISSUE [J].
BRUNDRETT, MC ;
ENSTONE, DE ;
PETERSON, CA .
PROTOPLASMA, 1988, 146 (2-3) :133-142
[3]   Formation and breakdown of ABA [J].
Cutler, AJ ;
Krochko, JE .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 1999, 4 (12) :472-478
[4]   THE PH GRADIENTS IN THE ROOT-SYSTEM AND THE ABSCISIC-ACID CONCENTRATION IN XYLEM AND APOPLASTIC SAPS [J].
DAETER, W ;
SLOVIK, S ;
HARTUNG, W .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 341 (1295) :49-56
[5]   Effect of alkaline and saline substrates on ABA contents, distribution and transport in plant roots [J].
Degenhardt, B ;
Gimmler, H ;
Hose, E ;
Hartung, W .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2000, 225 (1-2) :83-94
[6]  
Dracup Miles, 1998, P227
[7]   P-31 NMR OBSERVATIONS ON THE EFFECT OF THE EXTERNAL PH ON THE INTRACELLULAR PH VALUES IN PLANT-CELL SUSPENSION-CULTURES [J].
FOX, GG ;
RATCLIFFE, RG .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 93 (02) :512-521
[8]   Apoplastic transport of abscisic acid through roots of maize: effect of the exodermis [J].
Freundl, E ;
Steudle, E ;
Hartung, W .
PLANTA, 2000, 210 (02) :222-231
[9]  
GOUT E, 1992, J BIOL CHEM, V267, P13903
[10]   DOES ABSCISIC-ACID PLAY A STRESS PHYSIOLOGICAL-ROLE IN MAIZE PLANTS GROWING IN HEAVILY COMPACTED SOIL [J].
HARTUNG, W ;
ZHANG, JH ;
DAVIES, WJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1994, 45 (271) :221-226