Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach - Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination

被引:106
作者
Edelen, Maria Orlando
Thissen, David
Teresi, Jeanne A.
Kleinman, Marjorie
Ocepek-Welikson, Katja
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Stroud Ctr, New York State Psychiat Inst, New York, NY USA
[4] Hebrew Home Aged, New York, NY USA
关键词
IRT; DIF; translation;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000245251.83359.8c
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: An important part of examining the adequacy of measures for use in ethnically diverse populations is the evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF) among subpopulations such as those administered the measure in different languages. A number of methods exist for this purpose. Objective: The objective of this study was to introduce and demonstrate the identification of DIF using item response theory (IRT) and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Methods: Data come from a sample of community-residing elderly who were part of a dementia case registry. A total of 1578 participants were administered either an English (n = 913) or Spanish (n = 665) version of the 21-item Mini-Mental State Examination. IRT was used to identify language DIF in these items with the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Results: Fourteen of the 21 items exhibited significant DIF according to language of administration. However, because the direction of the identified DIF was not consistent for one language version over the other, the impact at the scale level was negligible. Conclusions: IRT and the likelihood-based model comparison approach comprise a powerful tool for DIF detection that can aid in the development, refinement, and evaluation of measures for use in ethnically diverse populations.
引用
收藏
页码:S134 / S142
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, IRTLRDIF V 2 0B SOFT
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]  
BOCK RD, 1970, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V35, P179
[4]   MARGINAL MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF ITEM PARAMETERS - APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM [J].
BOCK, RD ;
AITKIN, M .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1981, 46 (04) :443-459
[5]   Different kinds of DIF: A distinction between absolute and relative forms of measurement invariance and bias [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 26 (04) :433-450
[6]   Assessing differential functioning in a satisfaction scale [J].
Collins, WC ;
Raju, NS ;
Edwards, JE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (03) :451-461
[7]   Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight [J].
Donovan, MA ;
Drasgow, F ;
Probst, TM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (02) :305-313
[8]   DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING - IMPLICATIONS FOR TEST TRANSLATIONS [J].
ELLIS, BB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :912-921
[9]  
Embretson S. E., 2000, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY, Vxi, P371
[10]   The new rules of measurement [J].
Embretson, SE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1996, 8 (04) :341-349