Reducing the global burden of depression - Population-level analysis of intervention cost-effectiveness in 14 world regions

被引:211
作者
Chisholm, D
Sanderson, K
Ayuso-Mateos, JL
Saxena, S
机构
[1] WHO, Dept Hlth Syst Financing Expenditure & Resource A, CEP Team, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] WHO, Dept Mental Hlth & Substance Abuse, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Hosp Univ Princesa, Dept Psychiat, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.184.5.393
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: International evidence on the cost and effects of interventions for reducing the global burden of depression remain scarce. Aims: To estimate the population-level cost-effectiveness of evidence-based depression interventions and their contribution towards reducing current burden. Method: Primary-care-based depression interventions were modelled at the level of whole populations in 14 epidemiological subregions of the world. Total population-level costs (in international dollars or 1$) and effectiveness (disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted) were combined to form average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results: Evaluated interventions have the potential to reduce the current burden of depression by 10-30%. Pharmacotherapy with older antidepressant drugs, with or without proactive collaborative care, are currently more cost-effective strategies than those using newer antidepressants, particularly in lower-income subregions. Conclusions: Even in resource-poor regions, each DALY averted by efficient depression treatments in primary care costs less than 1 year of average per capita income, making such interventions a cost-effective use of health resources. However, current levels of burden can only be reduced significantly if there is a substantial increase in treatment coverage. Declaration of interest: None.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] ADAM T, 2003, COST EFFECTIVENESS R, V1
  • [2] Andrews Gavin, 2000, J Ment Health Policy Econ, V3, P175, DOI 10.1002/mhp.96
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, The world health report-mental health: New understanding, new hope
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Making Choices in Health: WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • [5] Treating depression in primary care in low-income women in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial
    Araya, R
    Rojas, G
    Fritsch, R
    Gaete, J
    Rojas, M
    Simon, G
    Peters, TJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9362) : 995 - 1000
  • [6] BARBUI C, 2002, TREATMENT DISCONTINU
  • [7] Group interpersonal psychotherapy for depression in rural Uganda - A randomized controlled trial
    Bolton, P
    Bass, J
    Neugebauer, R
    Verdeli, H
    Clougherty, KF
    Wickramaratne, P
    Speelman, L
    Ndogoni, L
    Weissman, M
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (23): : 3117 - 3124
  • [8] Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms
    Chilvers, C
    Dewey, M
    Fielding, K
    Gretton, V
    Miller, P
    Palmer, B
    Weller, D
    Churchill, R
    Williams, I
    Bedi, N
    Duggan, C
    Lee, A
    Harrison, G
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7289): : 772 - 775
  • [9] Integration of mental health care into primary care - Demonstration cost-outcome study in India and Pakistan
    Chisholm, D
    Sekar, K
    Kumar, KK
    Saeed, K
    James, S
    Mubbashar, M
    Murthy, RS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 : 581 - 588
  • [10] Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, 2001, MACR HLTH INV HLTH E