Phylogeny of nearctic members of the Anopheles maculipennis species group derived from the D2 variable region of 28S ribosomal RNA

被引:34
作者
Porter, CH [1 ]
Collins, FH [1 ]
机构
[1] CTR DIS CONTROL & PREVENT,NATL CTR INFECT DIS,DIV PARASIT DIS,CHAMBLEE,GA 30341
关键词
D O I
10.1006/mpev.1996.0070
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Phylogenetic affinities among taxa associated with the Nearctic component of the Anopheles maculipennis species group (subgenus Anopheles) were inferred from sequence divergence in the D2 variable region of 28S ribosomal RNA. The base composition of this region had a marked GC bias which ranged from 59.9% in Anopheles walkeri to 65.1% in Anopheles punctipennis E. Although over two-thirds of the base positions in the D2 region were double-stranded (stem), substitution frequencies at single-stranded (loop) positions (0.068 over all taxa) were 2.7 times greater than at stem positions (0.025). Most mutations were point mutations and were most frequent at loop positions. In the shortest trees generated by both parsimony and distance methods, the four American species traditionally identified with the maculipennis complex (Anopheles aztecus, Anopheles earlei, Anopheles freeborni, and Anopheles occidentalis) were monophyletic with & punctipennis E and W as sister taxa. The latter two correspond to genetically distinct forms from the eastern United States and California, respectively. The sibling species of the Anopheles quadrimaculatus complex formed a distinct clade, and A. quadrimaculatus D, with six autapomorphies, was the most divergent of these taxa. Sequence divergence between A. walkeri and the other taxa included in the study was of such magnitude as to suggest only a distant affinity to these species. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 188
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Argentine J.A., 1993, Insect Molecular Biology, V1, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1993.tb00091.x
[2]  
BARR A R, 1988, Mosquito Systematics, V20, P352
[3]  
BARR AR, 1958, TECHNICAL B U MINNES, V228
[4]  
Besansky N.J., 1993, Insect Molecular Biology, V1, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1993.tb00089.x
[5]  
Carpenter SJ, 1955, MOSQUITOES N AM
[6]   XENOPUS-LAEVIS-28S RIBOSOMAL-RNA - A SECONDARY STRUCTURE MODEL AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY AND FUNCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
CLARK, CG ;
TAGUE, BW ;
WARE, VC ;
GERBI, SA .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1984, 12 (15) :6197-6220
[7]   COMPARISON OF RDNA AND MTDNA IN THE SIBLING SPECIES ANOPHELES-FREEBORNI AND ANOPHELES-HERMSI [J].
COLLINS, FH ;
PORTER, CH ;
COPE, SE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1990, 42 (05) :417-423
[8]  
DARSIE RF, 1981, MOSQ SYST S, V1
[9]  
ELLSWORTH DL, 1994, EVOLUTION, V48, P122, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01299.x
[10]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1993, PHYLIP VERSION 3 5