An analysis of perioperative cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies

被引:60
作者
Fiore, NF
Ledniczky, G
Wiebke, EA
Broadie, TA
Pruitt, AL
Goulet, R
Canal, DF
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT SURG,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[2] INDIANA UNIV HOSP,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[3] WISHARD MEM HOSP,INDIANAPOLIS,IN
[4] JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY HOSP CHILDREN,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[5] RICHARD L ROUDEBUSH VET ADM MED CTR,INDIANAPOLIS,IN
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90092-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. We undertook this retrospective study to ascertain the proper role of perioperative cholangiography in the management of 1002 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Methods. Nine hundred forty-one patients were categorized as being at high or low risk for choledocholithiasis according to the presence or absence of jaundice, pancreatitis, elevated bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, or radiographic evidence of common bib duct stones (CBDSs). Results. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOCG) and preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were equivalent in the detection of CBDSs, and laparoscopic common bib duct exploration (CBDE) was successful in 12 of the 21 patients (57%) in whom it was attempted. The ducts of the other 52 patients with CBDSs were successfully cleared by preoperative or postoperative ERCP. Conclusions. Laparoscopic IOCG is successful in detecting CBDS in high-risk patients and half of these ducts can be cleared laparoscopically. The incidence of CBDS in low-risk patients is 1.7%, a risk that does not warrant routine cholangiography. These data suggest ERCP should be reserved for those at-risk individuals in whom IOCG or laparoscopic duct clearance has been unsuccessful.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 821
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Bagnato V J, 1991, Surg Laparosc Endosc, V1, P89
[2]
USEFUL PREDICTORS OF BILE-DUCT STONES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BARKUN, AN ;
BARKUN, JS ;
FRIED, GM ;
GHITULESCU, G ;
STEINMETZ, O ;
PHAM, C ;
MEAKINS, JL ;
GORESKY, CA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (01) :32-39
[3]
CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITHOUT OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT INJURY AND RETAINED COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
FRIED, GM ;
BARKUN, AN ;
SIGMAN, HH ;
HINCHEY, EJ ;
GARZON, J ;
WEXLER, MJ ;
MEAKINS, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (03) :371-379
[4]
ROUTINE OR SELECTED INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BERCI, G ;
SACKIER, JM ;
PAZPARTLOW, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :355-360
[5]
Blackwood W D, 1973, Gastrointest Endosc, V20, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(73)73873-6
[6]
One hundred consecutive laparoscopic cholangiograms - Results and conclusions [J].
Carroll, BJ ;
Phillips, EH ;
Rosenthal, R ;
Gleischman, S ;
Bray, JF .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (03) :319-323
[7]
CLAIR DG, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P551
[8]
ERICKSON RA, 1995, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V109, P262
[9]
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - RESULTS AND INDICATIONS [J].
FLOWERS, JL ;
ZUCKER, KA ;
GRAHAM, SM ;
SCOVILL, WA ;
IMBEMBO, AL ;
BAILEY, RW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (03) :209-216
[10]
THE CASE AGAINST ROUTINE OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY [J].
GERBER, A ;
APT, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 143 (06) :734-736