Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty-An interval chance-constrained programming approach

被引:207
作者
Cai, Y. P. [2 ]
Huang, G. H. [1 ]
Yang, Z. F. [3 ]
Lin, Q. G. [2 ]
Tan, Q. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Regina, Fac Engn, Environm Syst Engn Program, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Community; Decision making; Energy systems; Environment; Greenhouse gas; Management; Renewable energy; Uncertainty; SOLID-WASTE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOVOLTAICS; FEASIBILITY; SECURITY; POLICIES; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, an inexact community-scale energy model (ICS-EM) has been developed for planning renewable energy management (REM) systems under uncertainty. This method is based on an integration of the existing interval linear programming (ILP), chance-constrained programming (CCP) and mixed integer linear programming (MILP) techniques. ICS-EM allows uncertainties presented as both probability distributions and interval values to be incorporated within a general optimization framework. It can also facilitate capacity-expansion planning for energy-production facilities within a multi-period and multi-option context. Complexities in energy management systems can be systematically reflected, thus applicability of the modeling process can be highly enhanced. The developed method has then been applied to a case of long-term renewable energy management planning for three communities. Useful solutions for the planning of energy management systems have been generated. Interval solutions associated with different risk levels of constraint violation have been obtained. They can be used for generating decision alternatives and thus help decision makers identify desired policies under various economic and system-reliability constraints. The generated solutions can also provide desired energy resource/service allocation and capacity-expansion plans with a minimized system cost, a maximized system reliability and a maximized energy security. Tradeoffs between system costs and constraint-violation risks can also be tackled. Higher costs will increase system stability, while a desire for lower system costs will run into a risk of potential instability of the management system. They are helpful for supporting (a) adjustment or justification of allocation patterns of energy resources and services, (b) formulation of local policies regarding energy consumption, economic development and energy structure, and (c) analysis of interactions among economic cost, system reliability and energy-supply security. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 735
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条