Issues in targeted observing

被引:102
作者
Langland, Rolf H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Res Lab, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
关键词
adjoint methods; data assimilation; ensemble transformation; numerical weather prediction; TRANSFORM KALMAN-FILTER; METEOROLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS; STORM RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM; ADAPTIVE OBSERVATIONS; SINGULAR VECTORS; FORECAST ERRORS; DROPWINDSONDE OBSERVATIONS; ADJOINT SENSITIVITY; TROPOSPHERIC WINDS; OBSERVATION IMPACT;
D O I
10.1256/qj.05.130
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper summarizes successes and limitations of targeted observing field programmes starting from the Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment in 1997 through recent programmes targeting winter storms and tropical cyclones. These field programmes have produced average reductions in short-range forecast errors of about 10 per cent over regional verification areas, and maximum forecast error reductions as large as 50 per cent in certain cases. The majority of targeting cases investigated so far involve sets of dropsondes and other observation data that provide partial coverage of target areas. The primary scientific challenges for targeting include the refinement of objective methods that can identify optimal times and locations for targeted observations, as well as identify the specific types of satellite and in situ measurements that are required for the improvement of numerical weather forecasts. The most. advanced targeting procedures, at present, include: the ensemble transform Kalman Filter, Hessian singular vectors, and observation-space targeting using the adjoint of a variational data assimilation procedure. Targeted observing remains an active research topic in numerical weather prediction, with plans for continued refinement of objective targeting procedures, and field tests of new satellite and in situ observing systems.
引用
收藏
页码:3409 / 3425
页数:17
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance [J].
Aberson, SD .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2003, 131 (08) :1613-1628
[2]  
Aberson SD, 1999, B AM METEOROL SOC, V80, P421, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0421:IOHTAI>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Assimilation and modeling of the atmospheric hydrological cycle in the ECMWF forecasting system [J].
Andersson, E ;
Bauer, P ;
Beljaars, A ;
Chevallier, F ;
Hólm, E ;
Janisková, M ;
Kållberg, P ;
Kelly, G ;
Lopez, P ;
McNally, A ;
Moreau, E ;
Simmons, AJ ;
Thépaut, JN ;
Tompkins, AM .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 86 (03) :387-+
[5]   Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation-targeting problem [J].
Baker, NL ;
Daley, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 126 (565) :1431-1454
[6]   Adaptive observations during FASTEX: A systematic survey of upstream flights [J].
Bergot, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 125 (561) :3271-3298
[7]  
Bergot T, 2002, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V128, P1689, DOI 10.1002/qj.200212858315
[8]   Influence of the assimilation scheme on the efficiency of adaptive observations [J].
Bergot, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 127 (572) :635-660
[9]  
Bishop CH, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P1748, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1748:ETAAO>2.0.CO
[10]  
2