Plurality voting-based multiple classifier systems:: statistically independent with respect to dependent classifier sets

被引:22
作者
Demirekler, M [1 ]
Altinçay, H
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Elect, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Gazimagusa, Cyprus
关键词
multiple classifier systems; statistical classifier combination; statistical pattern recognition; classifier selection; independent distributions; best distributions; worst distributions; adding new classifiers; plurality voting; Bayesian formalism;
D O I
10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00227-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The simultaneous use of multiple classifiers has been shown to provide performance improvement in classification problems. The selection of an optimal set of classifiers is an important part of multiple classifier systems and the independence of classifier outputs is generally considered to be an advantage for obtaining better multiple classifier systems. In this paper, the need for the classifier independence is interrogated from classification performance point of view. The performance achieved with the use of classifiers having independent joint distributions is compared to some other classifiers which are defined to have best and worst joint distributions. These distributions are obtained by formulating the combination operation as an optimization problem. The analysis revealed several important observations about classifier selection which are then used to analyze the problem of selecting an additional classifier to be used with the available multiple classifier system. (C) 2002 Pattern Recognition Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2365 / 2379
页数:15
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Unified decision combination framework [J].
Al-Ghoneim, K ;
Kumar, BVKV .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1998, 31 (12) :2077-2089
[2]   An information theoretic framework for weight estimation in the combination of probabilistic classifiers for speaker identification [J].
Altinçay, H ;
Demirekler, M .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2000, 30 (04) :255-272
[3]   DEMOCRACY IN NEURAL NETS - VOTING SCHEMES FOR CLASSIFICATION [J].
BATTITI, R ;
COLLA, AM .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 7 (04) :691-707
[4]   Information combination operators for data fusion: A comparative review with classification [J].
Bloch, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1996, 26 (01) :52-67
[5]   A method of combining multiple probabilistic classifiers through soft competition on different feature sets [J].
Chen, K ;
Chi, HS .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 1998, 20 (1-3) :227-252
[6]   NEURAL NETWORK ENSEMBLES [J].
HANSEN, LK ;
SALAMON, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1990, 12 (10) :993-1001
[7]  
Ho T. K., 1996, P ICPR
[8]  
Ho TK, 1998, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V20, P832, DOI 10.1109/34.709601
[9]  
HO TK, 1994, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V16, P66, DOI 10.1109/34.273716
[10]  
JACOBS RA, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P865