Efficacy, Tolerance, and Safety of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors as Rescue Immunosuppressants in Liver Transplantation

被引:29
作者
Alamo, J. M. [1 ]
Barrera, L. [1 ]
Casado, M. D. [1 ]
Bernal, C. [1 ]
Marin, L. M. [1 ]
Suarez, G. [1 ]
Sanchez-Moreno, L. [1 ]
Jimenez, R. [1 ]
Suarez-Grau, J. M. [1 ]
Sousa, J. M. [1 ]
Cordero, E. [1 ]
Gomez-Bravo, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virgen Rocio Hosp, Liver Transplantat Unit, Seville, Spain
关键词
SIROLIMUS; RECIPIENTS; REJECTION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.083
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
071005 [微生物学]; 100108 [医学免疫学];
摘要
Background. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors behave as potent immunosuppressants which have the advantages, with respect to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI: cyclosporine or tacrolimus), of no nephrotoxicity and inhibition of cell proliferation. They are particularly suitable for patients with renal insufficiency or neoplasias. Materials and Methods. Twenty-two liver transplant patients were immunosuppressed with everolimus or sirolimus as rescue therapy after CNI treatment: 7 hepatocellular carcinomas; 5 de novo malignancies; 4 renal insufficiencies; 4 chronic rejections; and 2 acute rejection episodes. Results. There were 16.7% tumor recurrences, and 25% improvements in renal function, 75% in chronic rejection, and 50% in acute rejection. There was no incidence of rejection, kidney failure, gastrointestinal intolerance, hydrocarbon intolerance, hypertension, or arterial or venous thrombosis. We observed incidences of 50% for hypercholesterolemia, 31.8% for hypertriglyceridemia, 22.7% for thrombocytopenia, 18.2% for leukopenia, and 9.1% for anemia. The intercurrent infection rate was 13.6%, including oral thrush in 13.6%. Lower limb edema occurred in 13.6%, with 1 case of facial edema and 1 of alopecia. Conclusions. mTOR inhibitors were safe immunosuppressive drugs whose side effects were controlled and easily managed. They have advantages with respect to CNI due to their slight effects on kidney function and lack of promotion of diabetes mellitus. Although their long-term effectiveness for control of neoplastic diseases is yet to be seen, they can be used safely in these patients with no incidence of rejection. Their effectiveness to control chronic rejection seems significant, but it is doubtful for steroid-resistant acute rejection episodes.
引用
收藏
页码:2181 / 2183
页数:3
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]
What have we learned about primary liver transplantation under tacrolimus immunosuppression? Long-term follow-up of the first 1000 patients [J].
Jain, A ;
Reyes, J ;
Kashyap, R ;
Rohal, S ;
Abu-Elmagd, K ;
Starzl, T ;
Fung, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :441-448
[2]
Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation [J].
Kniepeiss, D ;
Iberer, F ;
Grasser, B ;
Schaffellner, S ;
Tschetiessnigg, KH .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 16 (07) :504-509
[3]
LEVY G, 2006, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V12, P1571
[4]
Effects of everolimus monotherapy on hematological parameters and iron homeostasis in de novo liver transplant recipients: Preliminary results [J].
Masetti, M. ;
Rompianesi, G. ;
Montalti, R. ;
Romano, A. ;
Spaggiari, M. ;
Ballarin, R. ;
Guerrini, G. P. ;
Gerunda, G. E. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (06) :1947-1949
[5]
A retrospective review of sirolimus (rapamune) therapy in orthotopic liver transplant recipients diagnosed with chronic rejection [J].
Neff, GW ;
Montalbano, M ;
Slapak-Green, G ;
Berney, T ;
Bejarano, PA ;
Joshi, A ;
Icardi, M ;
Nery, J ;
Seigo, N ;
Levi, D ;
Weppler, D ;
Pappas, P ;
Ruiz, V ;
Schiff, ER ;
Tzakis, AG .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (05) :477-483
[6]
Sirolimus therapy in liver transplant patients: An initial experience at a single center [J].
Nocera, A. ;
Andorno, E. ;
Tagliamacco, A. ;
Morelli, N. ;
Bottino, G. ;
Ravazzoni, F. ;
Casaccia, M. ;
Barocci, S. ;
Alice, S. ;
Santori, G. ;
Ghirelli, R. ;
Valente, U. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (06) :1950-1952
[7]
Roque J, 2005, REV MED CHILE, V133, P1221