Established breast cancer risk factors by clinically important tumour characteristics

被引:115
作者
Garcia-Closas, M.
Brinton, L. A.
Lissowska, J.
Chatterjee, N.
Peplonska, B.
Anderson, W. F.
Szeszenia-Dabrowska, N.
Bardin-Mikolajczak, A.
Zatonski, W.
Blair, A.
Kalaylioglu, Z.
Rymkiewicz, G.
Mazepa-Sikora, D.
Kordek, R.
Lukaszek, S.
Sherman, M. E.
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] Ctr Canc, Dept Canc Epidemiol & Prevent, Warsaw, Poland
[3] M Sklodowska Curie Inst Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Lodz, Poland
[5] IMS, Silver Spring, MD USA
[6] Ctr Canc, Dept Pathol, Warsaw, Poland
[7] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Pathol, Lodz, Poland
[8] Polish Mothers Mem Hosp, Res Inst, Dept Clin Pathomorphol, Lodz, Poland
关键词
breast cancer; epidemiology; aetiologic heterogeneity; histology;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603207
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is a morphologically and clinically heterogeneous disease; however, it is less clear how risk factors relate to tumour features. We evaluated risk factors by tumour characteristics ( histopathologic type, grade, size, and nodal status) in a population-based case-control of 2386 breast cancers and 2502 controls in Poland. Use of a novel extension of the polytomous logistic regression permitted simultaneous modelling of multiple tumour characteristics. Late age at first full-term birth was associated with increased risk of large (42 cm) tumours (odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) 1.19 (1.07 - 1.33) for a 5-year increase in age), but not smaller tumours (P for heterogeneity adjusting for other tumour features (P-het) = 0.007). On the other hand, multiparity was associated with reduced risk for small tumours (0.76 (0.68 - 0.86) per additional birth; P-het = 0.004). Consideration of all tumour characteristics simultaneously revealed that current or recent use of combined hormone replacement therapy was associated with risk of small (2.29 (1.66 - 3.15)) and grade 1 (3.36 (2.22 - 5.08)) tumours (P-het = 0.05 for size and 0.0008 for grade 1 vs 3), rather than specific histopathologic types (P-het = 0.63 for ductal vs lobular). Finally, elevated body mass index was associated with larger tumour size among both pre- and postmenopausal women (P-het = 0.05 and 0.0001, respectively). None of these relationships were explained by hormone receptor status of the tumours. In conclusion, these data support distinctive risk factor relationships by tumour characteristics of prognostic relevance. These findings might be useful in developing targeted prevention efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Althuis MD, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P1558
[2]   Distinct breast cancer incidence and prognostic patterns in the NCI's SEER program: suggesting a possible link between etiology and outcome [J].
Anderson, WF ;
Jatoi, I ;
Devesa, SS .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 90 (02) :127-137
[3]   Distinct incidence patterns among in situ and invasive breast carcinomas, with possible etiologic implications [J].
Anderson, WF ;
Chu, KC ;
Devesa, SS .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 88 (02) :149-159
[4]  
Anderson WF, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P1128
[5]   Estrogen receptor breast cancer phenotypes in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database [J].
Anderson, WF ;
Chatterjee, N ;
Ershler, WB ;
Brawley, OW .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 76 (01) :27-36
[6]  
[Anonymous], DIS BREAST
[7]  
Beral V, 1997, LANCET, V350, P1047, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08233-0
[8]   A two-stage regression model for epidemiological studies with multivariate disease classification data [J].
Chatterjee, N .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (465) :127-138
[9]   Hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer [J].
Chen, CL ;
Weiss, NS ;
Newcomb, P ;
Barlow, WN ;
White, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (06) :734-741
[10]   Body mass and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis [J].
Cui, YD ;
Whiteman, MK ;
Flaws, JA ;
Langenberg, P ;
Tkaczuk, KH ;
Bush, TL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 98 (02) :279-283